AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Victor Wu

MATH106 · MATH03A · MATH001 · MATH012 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
61.54%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Worth it if you want a , but and grind homework.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing math teacherExtra credit helperHeavy online homeworkUnclear lecturesKind but inconsistent
  • Recent reviews praise kindness, , and real help with calculus.
  • , and tough theory tests.
  • Experience depends heavily on whether he is the main instructor or a substitute.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

and support help, but tough theory tests and .

; older and online reviews show more friction.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Math content itself is standard difficulty; struggle comes more from lecture clarity than pure concept hardness.

Difficulty ratings are low in recent in-person terms and higher in older/online terms.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Some terms list attendance mandatory, others optional, with no single strict policy story.

Online review marked mandatory; in-person reports both mandatory and optional.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

About 62% would take again; glowing recent tutoring-style praise clashes with harsh older warnings.

Online review is negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and deadline extensions appear, but tough grader and .

Format shift

Online and older in-person lean tougher; recent in-person lean kinder.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Large online homework sets with multi-part questions consume a lot of time.

Format shift

Heavy homework is mainly documented in in-person MATH106 reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Can be an amazing supportive teacher or a hard-to-follow lecturer depending on the term.

Format shift

Recent in-person praise is strong; substitute/online comments are poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Mix of large homework chunks, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online ; in-person stresses both HW and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews split between wonderful supportive mentor and .

Main concern

Lecture clarity and .

What students said

“Loved Dr. Wu he really understood the material and helped me learn when I struggled.”
MATH106
“ . He is extremely disrespectful.”
MATH03A
“Gives 100 online questions for . But in reality the 100 questions all have 3+ parts”
MATH106

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and drove enrollment down.

Main concern

and incomplete lecturing force self-teaching.

What students said

“While he is a . I had him as a substitute He would take weeks to grade exams/quizzes.”
MATH001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams can be theory-focused and grade-heavy; friendliness depends on term and .

Theory-heavy testsSlow gradingQuizzes and exams matter

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and emphasize theory over worked examples.

Tests are toughTheory-focusedHomework online
“The and they are based almost completely on theory rather than problems.”
MATH012

Online

Online and and incomplete coverage.

Slow exam gradingSelf-taught gaps
“ . Our class dropped from 21 to like 10 students.”
MATH001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He knows the subject, but he simply cannot teach it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews with 1 online and 12 in-person, highlighting polarized teaching quality and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Loved Dr. Wu he really understood the material and helped me learn when I struggled.”

📚

32/100

“Gives 100 online questions for . But in reality the 100 questions all have 3+ parts so 100 easily turns into 300+.”

⚖️ Help

70/100

“Dr. Wu was an .”

⚠️ Clarity Issues

35/100

“Hard to understand him, his English is broken.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Wonderful lad
  • ! Worked with me for hours
  • Regularly makes easy mistakes when lecturing

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • appears often in tags
  • Had to self teach and get a tutor.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Great man if you get to know him! Willing to help!
  • and accommodating
  • stop emailing him, it's why exams take him a long time to grade

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

13 reviews with strong detail but polarized eras and one online substitute case reduce overall consistency.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1065 reviews
MATH0013 reviews
MATH03A3 reviews
MATH0122 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 4 · A 2 · A- 2

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values