AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Vikash Chand

NCBU001 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want deep accounting content and can handle .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAmazing lecturesLots of homeworkEmail hard to reachCareer-focusedDetailed but long
  • Online students praise detailed career-ready lectures and .
  • Attendance is mandatory and .
  • hard topics.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

One student earned an A and others audited non-credit sections, but comments do not describe a free A for credit work.

Most grade talk is from Online non-credit reviews; the only In person grade noted was a B+.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-to-high and students note detailed content plus long lectures, not light material.

Online and In person both describe real content load; Online stresses depth, In person stresses weak hard-topic coverage.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Every review that as mandatory.

and In person NCBU001 sections.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

All four reviewers say they would take him again, mainly for detailed teaching and career prep.

Recommendation is strongest Online; the single In person review still said yes but with weaker teaching praise.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Limited grade data shows an A and a B+ with .

Format shift

Online includes a reported A; In person reports a B+.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Tags and comments call out lots of homework and long detailed lectures.

Format shift

; In person focuses on lecture length more than homework.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Two strong Online reviews praise deep lectures and and one weak In person review.

Format shift

Online teaching praise is high; In .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Students mention homework and lectures but .

Format shift

Neither Online nor In person reviews clearly map assessment weights.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One review says lectures run long but skim complex material.

Main concern

.

What students said

“The quiet long yet lack a lot of content.”
NCBU001

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Strong content and career prep with detailed lectures; .

Main concern

Slow or .

What students said

“Professor Chand lectures are long because he teaches the material in detail with content.”
NCBU001
“He is a good teacher, but he doesn't answer his emails.”
NCBU001
“ .”
NCBU001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person review does not describe exams.

Online

Online comments focus on lectures and .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor and take the class. You will learn a lot of in his class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting lecture depth, recommendation, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Depth

72/100

“Professor Chand lectures are long because he teaches the material in detail with content.”

👍

82/100

“ .”

📧 Communication Gap

40/100

“He is a good teacher, but he doesn't answer his emails.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • teaches the material in detail with content
  • but just brushes over the more complicated things

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Access

  • Lots of homework
  • doesn't answer his emails

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews, mixed formats, sparse grade detail, and limited consistency lower confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NCBU0014 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 2