AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Davidson Wong

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid this instructor if you want a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProRudeTalks Behind StudentsAlways AngryUnsupportive CoachingAvoid
  • Both reviews describe rude behavior, gossip about students, and constant anger.
  • Students say he mocks ability and never gives positive encouragement during workouts.
  • No reviewer recommends him despite one reported A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

One student reported an A, but comments focus on hostility rather than how grades are earned.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty is mid-range (3/5) and centers on workout standards rather than academic content load.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and another says it is mandatory.

reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Both because of rude, demeaning behavior.

Recommendation signal is uniformly negative in in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

, but students do not describe generous or harsh academic grading in detail.

Format shift

In-person only; .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Comments emphasize workout .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students describe constant anger, gossip, mockery, and .

Format shift

Both in-person reviews are strongly negative on interpersonal teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment appears performance-based around workouts rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as hostile, with public mockery, gossip, and uncustomized workouts that demoralize students.

Main concern

Toxic interpersonal behavior overshadows any technical instruction.

What students said

“awful. Is always talking behind peoples backs and making fun of people and very angry.”
50106
“This trainer is rude and talks behind student's backs.”
50106

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

No exam details reportedPerformance/workout focus

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments discuss workouts and interpersonal behavior, not exams.

No formal exam process reported
“He truly has made us feel bad when we can't do a workout to his standards because he doesn't customize it to our capabilities.”
50106

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This trainer is rude and talks behind student's backs. He truly has made us feel bad when we can't do a workout to his standards because he doesn't customize it to our capabilities.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with consistent hostility themes. Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Disaster

10/100

“awful. Is always talking behind peoples backs and making fun of people and very angry.”

👎

8/100

“ ”

😤 Hostile Coaching Style

12/100

“He has never told us once that we did a good job and is always angry.”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • talking behind peoples backs and making fun of people
  • rude and talks behind student's backs
  • is always angry

Theme 2

🏋️ About Coaching Style

  • doesn't customize it to our capabilities
  • called people in my class un-athletic
  • never told us once that we did a good job

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only two recent same-course reviews exist; they agree strongly but the sample is too small and narrow for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

501062 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values