AI Rate Professor

Theater

Elizabeth Dale

THEAR010 · THEAR040A · THEAR14B · THEAR15 · THEA015 · THEA014B · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you need the units and can handle heavy writing with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderWriting HeavyInconsistent EmailsReading HeavyPolarizing Online
  • Online film and theater electives are writing- and .
  • some call her sweet and responsive; others report ignored emails and .
  • , but almost all recent evidence is mixed-to-negative online.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

You can pass and sometimes earn an A with steady work and , but and high-stakes writing make a high grade far from free.

Almost all grade and effort evidence is from online reviews; the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Theater appreciation content is approachable, but , and .

and papers; the one in-person acting class was described as pure fun and low confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

as mandatory with participation mattering, while , so flexibility depends on the section.

Online reviews report both mandatory and ; in-person attendance was not clearly stated.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; praise for kindness and electives and poor online support for many students.

Online opinions are polarized; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and complaints about unfair paper and and subjective.

Format shift

Strict grading complaints come almost entirely from online courses.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Expect , and writing-heavy papers rather than a light elective load.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize reading and papers; in-person acting sounded lighter and more activity-based.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

, and encouraging, while many online students call her meh, unresponsive, or .

Format shift

In-person acting review is glowing; recent online film/theater reviews are much more mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and exams, with papers often carrying heavy weight.

Format shift

; in-person acting did not detail assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One older beginning acting review paints her as sweet, hilarious, and .

Main concern

, so it may not reflect current courses.

What students said

“Seriously, sweetest lady youll ever meet and shes hilarious as well.”
THEAR040A

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online theater and film classes lean reading- and writing-heavy with quizzes and papers; grading often feels harsh and uneven, and .

Main concern

replies can tank a grade even when the content is passable.

What students said

“I was disappointed that I never got the chance to raise my grade after the job on the .”
THEA015
“Your grade is mostly exams, which have the most ridiculous questions based on the .”
THEA015
“Tough tests, but grade. Beware of papers.”
THEAR15

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests can feel deceptively hard and reading-heavy, though .

Tough TestsReading-Based QuestionsQuizzesMake-Up Assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review.

Online

Online tests are often described as tough or unfairly detailed from dense reading, with quizzes and .

Tough TestsReading-Based QuestionsQuizzesHigh-Weight Papers
“The . There were some questions about stuff we didn't even learn about.”
THEA015
“Your grade is mostly exams, which have the most ridiculous questions based on the reading”
THEA015

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be warned, Film appreciation sounds fun, but I really regretted choosing her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (10 online, 1 in-person), highlighting grading hardness, writing load, and polarized support. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

32/100

“The . We would have discussion posts worth 1 point each and papers worth 30 points”

📝 Writing Heavy Load

42/100

“It is really writing heavy.”

📧 Inconsistent Support

48/100

“ and doesn't submit the correct grades.”

👍 Polarized Recommendation

48/100

“ if you need it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Overall, just a better in person.
  • Professor Dale is one of the most encouraging and sweet teachers I've ever had.
  • The teacher was really nice, understanding, and responsive.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I was a 4.0 student until this class.
  • Other than that, its an easy class to pass
  • Tough tests, but grade.

Theme 3

✉️ About Communication

  • but if it's anything tech-related don't expect help.
  • She doesn't update canvas quickly or

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews spanning 2011-2023 with concrete detail, but opinions polarize and .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

THEA0154 reviews
THEAR0103 reviews
THEA014B1 review
THEAR040A1 review
THEAR14B1 review
Show 1 more courses
THEAR151 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

5

B 5

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values