AI Rate Professor

Design

Tiina Keller

FD062 · FD50 · FD60 · FDAT51 · FDALL · FD054 · FD51 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid if ; only take her if and studying the book on your own.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderUnclear instructionsSkilled sewer not teacherMandatory attendanceMoody communication
  • Many students say she sews well but teaches poorly with .
  • , and mandatory attendance create high stress.
  • A minority note improvement and ; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students get As, but , and heavy work make an A hard-earned not easy.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

High difficulty ratings and learn.

All evidence is in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and warn that skipping means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

, but many older and recent reviews urge not recommending her.

; one newer review is more positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and comments about docked grades even when following class directions.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of , and heavy sewing practice load.

Format shift

Workload evidence is in-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Students repeatedly say she is skilled at sewing but .

Format shift

One 2021 review says she improved; majority still rate teaching poorly.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and tricky tests that require showing up.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person fashion design students often find demos useful but and mandatory attendance.

Main concern

, and tough grading make the class stressful.

What students said

“She is good at sewing, but not good at teaching.”
FD51
“It was a very stressful and unpleasant experience to go through her classes.”
FD054
“ so you can rewatch it”
FDAT51

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Surprise quizzes and tricky tests reward attendance; .

Pop quizzesTest heavyTricky test questionsMandatory attendance for tests

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tricky tests; questions can include things she only said in class.

Surprise quizzesTest heavyTricky questions from class outline
“She gives surprise quizzes & 2 free late work coupons.”
FD60
“Her testing is kind of tricky, questions contain things she says outline sometimes so show up to class!”
FD50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is good at sewing, but not good at teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person fashion design reviews, highlighting skill versus teaching clarity gaps. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Shes not a very good teacher because she doesn't actually "teach". .”

👎 Recommendation

35/100

“ .”

⚖️

28/100

“Sometimes she'll even dock you if you follow the directions she gave you in class.”

⚠️ Stressful Experience

25/100

“It was a very stressful and unpleasant experience to go through her classes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She
  • and instructions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I took her got mostly A's

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • she is moody
  • she might get irritated and raise her voice
  • She can be rude and moody sometimes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews from 2008-2023 consistently describe unclear teaching and .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

FD0542 reviews
FD0622 reviews
FD502 reviews
FD602 reviews
FD511 review
Show 2 more courses
FDALL1 review
FDAT511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values