AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Xiao (rose) Wang

CHEMB · CHEMCHEM · CHEM5772 · CHEM1A · CHEM200 · CHEMA · CHEM1B · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take her if , and ; avoid summer chem if you need a gentle intro.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLanguage barrierExtra credit heavyDaily quizzesCaring but unclearSummer chem caution
  • , and if you keep up with homework.
  • Language barrier and fast pace are the most common complaints, especially in summer.
  • and fair once you lean on the textbook and review sheets.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

, and lenient grading make an A reachable if you do the work, .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Content is standard intro chem but summer pace and dense detail raise the challenge for many students.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and strict attendance tracking appear in several comments, though not always formal policy.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Students who self-study and ; others warn about accent, speed, and summer overload.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

, and high pass rates make grades more forgiving than the lectures feel.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and but feel heavy in summer.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Students split between caring and prepared versus hard to understand and fast or negative in tone.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and finals all count, with reviews and helping.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person Chem 1A/1B with , and mixed feedback on clarity versus leniency.

Main concern

Accent and fast pacing make lectures without heavy textbook study.

What students said

“If you are willing to pay attention in classes and do the , and review the well”
CHEM1A
“very easy A esp. with . poor teaching skills largely due to significant language barrier”
CHEM1A
“ . Will ruin your summer.”
CHEM200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; review sheets and pop quizzes lower risk more than format does.

In-class quizzesMidterms and finalReview sheetsExtra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Quizzes, midterms, and finals with review sheets; labs and .

In-class quizzesReview sessionsLab reportsExtra credit
“Work hard and get an A. .”
CHEMB
“Mrs Wang gives very fair and thorough tests. They cover almost everything at an easy level”
CHEM5772

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“very easy A esp. with . poor teaching skills largely due to significant language barrier.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 in-person reviews, highlighting accent, leniency, and summer risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

55/100

“ but . Nice woman though.”

📈 Easy A Path

78/100

“She practically gives you a passing grade if u do half the !”

❤️ Student Support

70/100

“ and invested in our success.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Accent is very hard to understand. Need subtitles for her lol.
  • She goes too fast, even for her syllabus
  • Super nice and great teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • very easy A esp. with
  • Work hard and get an A
  • Easiest chem prof.you can have

Theme 3

⚠️ About Summer Chem

  • . Will ruin your summer.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

25 mostly older in-person reviews with mixed polarity; detail is good but many predate 2012 and grades are sparsely reported.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM1A15 reviews
CHEM1B5 reviews
CHEM2001 review
CHEM57721 review
CHEMA1 review
Show 2 more courses
CHEMB1 review
CHEMCHEM1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values