AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Jeremy Abrams

POL1 · POLIT001 · POLI001 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you need Poli Sci and will read and self-study; prefer online or short terms over long lecture-heavy semesters.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLecture heavyGet ready to readClear grading criteriaQuiz after lectureVague study guides
  • some find online or condensed terms easy with quizzes and papers; others call lectures boring and self-taught.
  • Exams and ; study guides often feel vague.
  • ; better fit if you already know politics or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some earn A or B+ with notes and reading, but and study .

Online leans easier with quiz prep; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard intro poli sci; difficulty spikes with , and .

Online short terms feel more manageable; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews split between mandatory and optional; some say show up and .

In-person more often mandatory; online often not specified.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; online fans praise structure while unless required.

Online reviews trend yes; in-person is split and often no.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Fair on papers and some bonus on exams, but and study guides vague.

Format shift

Online students more often call him a .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, and lecture note-taking; winter sessions pile work daily.

Format shift

Online winter terms feel denser; and .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Knowledgable and sometimes engaging on current events, but many find lectures tedious, fast, or self-taught.

Format shift

Online quality scores are higher; in-person is polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Multiple exams plus papers and .

Format shift

Online emphasizes quizzes; and reading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

knowledgeable but often boring, speech-like lectures with and tough or vague exams.

Main concern

, and exams that feel hard relative to vague study guides.

What students said

“His lectures are like a long speech, which is why trying to type as fast as he talks is really hard.”
POL1
“the class was really taught by myself. You have to read the book because lectures are boring and the .”
POLIT001

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online and short-session students report concise , and .

Main concern

Winter or accelerated and daily quizzes.

What students said

“he is a really amazing teacher! He provides you with enough information in his notes and videos to prepare you for the quizzes!”
POLIT001
“the course content was concise, to the point, and detailed.”
POLI001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard exam-and-quiz structure with study guides that students often find unhelpful and heavy textbook reliance.

Multiple choice examsVague study guidesQuiz after lectureTextbook-based

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and book-based with brief study guides students call vague or unhelpful.

Multiple choiceVague study guidesTextbook-based exams
“He gives a study guide for the tests, but it really isn't that helpful.”
POL1
“ but are still pretty hard.”
POLIT001

Online

Online students mention quizzes from notes and videos; .

Lecture quizzesNotes and videos prep
“He provides you with enough information in his notes and videos to prepare you for the quizzes!”
POLIT001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Even though I got an A, the class was really taught by myself. You have to read the book because lectures are boring and the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews (4 online, 20 in , and format-dependent ease. Credibility rating: High.

📚

48/100

“the class was really taught by myself. You have to read the book because lectures are boring and the .”

👍 Online Path Better

70/100

“Honestly amazing!! TAKE HIS COURSE!”

🗣️ Lecture Fatigue

40/100

“His lectures are like a long speech, which is why trying to type as fast as he talks is really hard.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are like a long speech
  • He cares about the subject and applied the material to modern day
  • lacks communication skills

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Prof Abrahams class was so easy
  • study guides are somewhat vague

Theme 3

📖 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • you have to ready a lot

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four reviews spanning many years with , and mixed recommendation.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 511
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

POLIT00116 reviews
POL14 reviews
POLI0012 reviews
366701 review
434401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

6

B+ 4 · B 2

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1