AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Karina Dundurs

BUS51 · CIS03 · C30 · BUSN061 · CIS099 · BUSN46 · BUS46 · BUS061 · CA064 · BUS046 · BUS005 · BUS05 · BUS70 · CA62G · CAOS62G · CIS002 · CA062 · BUSN046 · CA33 · CABU · CA30 · EXCELEXCE · CA62B · CA030 · EXCELCA62 · CA062B · CIS2 · 52 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
45%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Prefer her in person if at all; for online Excel or business classes, only enroll if and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear InstructionsSlow Email ResponseExtra Credit and RedosSelf Teach HeavyPolarizing Online
  • many online students report no replies and chaos, while .
  • Success often means teaching yourself Excel or business software and following picky instructions.
  • , redos, and works.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some get A with redos and , but unclear instructions and .

Online often feels harder due to confusion; in-person and redos help more.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Software and intro business content can be easy when instructions work, but disorganization raises the real challenge.

Older online software classes sometimes feel easy; many recent online Excel and business courses feel hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

68/100

, though pop quizzes and in-class projects reward showing up.

Both formats often list attendance optional, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

; online reviewers often warn to avoid while .

Online recommendation is weaker; and sometimes enthusiastic.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Tough-grader tags, no-late-work rules, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Lots of , and late-semester assignment dumps appear across many courses.

Format shift

Online Excel and .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Quality swings from excellent helpful instructor to zero teaching and ignored emails.

Format shift

Online quality is much weaker on average than many in-person reports.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and redos dominate more than pure high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy; , and pop quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

: some call lectures interesting with and redos, while others still say you teach yourself from the book.

Main concern

Organization and clarity still vary, with pop quizzes and .

What students said

“Excellent and easy to follow lectures. She makes Excel easy.”
CA62B
“if expect you to teach yourself the curriculum.”
BUS51
“Allows redoing of .”
CIS002

Remote format

Online

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews frequently report missing feedback, , and feeling abandoned, though a minority still succeed and praise redos.

Main concern

Poor communication and .

What students said

“She doesn't teach anything. Nothing. Videos are so bad you can barely use them.”
EXCELCA62
“Completely disengaged from communications, no help whatsoever, did not answer any pleas for assistance.”
CIS03
“Allows you to correct your assignments until you get it right to improve your grade.”
BUSN046

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and project finals, with limited detail on proctoring tools.

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

quizzes, group projects, and redo-friendly project work.

Pop QuizzesGroup ProjectsMidterm and FinalProject Redos
“there is and the final.”
BUS51
“ .”
CIS002

Online

Online comments focus more on assignment uploads and occasional finals than on proctoring software; one student said midterm and .

Assignment HeavyMidterm and FinalRedo Allowed
“ if you're smart enough to use google search). .”
CIS03
“Grades HW up to a month after due date.”
BUS46

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Karina can be a good teacher in person, but she is bad with online classes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting online issues, workload, and polarized support. Credibility rating: High.

📡 Online Communication Gap

28/100

“She does not respond to emails, she , and .”

🔁 Redo and

60/100

“Allows you to correct your assignments until you get it right to improve your grade.”

🎯 Polarized Teaching

48/100

“Great teacher! The class was hard at times but the way she taught, made it easy to understand!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't teach anything. Nothing.
  • Excellent and easy to follow lectures. She makes Excel easy.
  • if expect you to teach yourself the curriculum.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Professor Dundurs has specific instructions and expectations, and has a strict no late work policy.
  • There is a good deal of and vocabulary.
  • You need to work for an A, luckily I ended up with one

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • Asked 3 x's to talk @office hrs, over 2.5 wks, no response.
  • .
  • she responded in a timely manner and let us work at our own pace.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

52

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years give a large, detailed, and consistently polarized sample, especially .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 57
1 out of 510

Course coverage

CA62G7 reviews
BUS516 reviews
CIS0025 reviews
BUS703 reviews
EXCELCA623 reviews
Show 22 more courses
CA0622 reviews
CA062B2 reviews
CA332 reviews
CIS032 reviews
BUS0051 review
BUS0461 review
BUS051 review
BUS0611 review
BUS461 review
BUSN0461 review
BUSN0611 review
BUSN461 review
C301 review
CA0301 review
CA0641 review
CA301 review
CA62B1 review
CABU1 review
CAOS62G1 review
CIS0991 review
CIS21 review
EXCELEXCE1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2