AI Rate Professor

Design

Stacey Houghton

DM21A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Skip unless and can tolerate a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized CanvasSelf-learning requiredGraded by few thingsParticipation mattersHybrid unclear
  • and heavy self-teaching for HTML/CSS.
  • ; and one big website project.
  • and left with a B after doing most learning alone.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Few graded items and a B grade suggest moderate effort, not a free A.

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content was basic HTML/CSS with low rated difficulty, but organization made it feel messy.

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

.

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and .

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Graded by few things with a reported B; not harsh but .

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Workload

Light

65/100

Main load was self-study plus quizzes and .

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Mid quality rating with and limited in-class payoff beyond quizzes.

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Quizzes and a .

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Hybrid-style design course with ; in-class work mostly fed quizzes and a , so students self-taught CSS and HTML.

Main concern

and little structured guidance outside quizzes.

What students said

“the Canvas portion was pretty unclear and ”
DM21A
“I did a lot of self learning. CSS & HTML only.”
DM21A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize quizzes and a .

QuizzesProject-based assessment

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-class work mainly mattered for quizzes; major assessment was a website project.

QuizzesWebsite project
“In class work didn't seem to matter outside of .”
DM21A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I did a lot of self learning. CSS & HTML only.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting organization and . Credibility rating: Low.

🗂️ Course Organization

40/100

“the Canvas portion was pretty unclear and ”

📚 Self Teaching Load

65/100

“I did a lot of self learning. CSS & HTML only.”

👎

18/100

“No”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching & Structure

  • and disorganized
  • Suggests a textbook to use but I didn't use it once
  • I did a lot of self learning

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • Graded by few things
  • In class work didn't seem to matter outside of quizzes
  • the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only one dated review with limited detail, so confidence in patterns is low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

DM21A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values