AI Rate Professor

Design

Anna Evfimiou

FD56 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; look for a fashion instructor who teaches foundations without assuming prior expertise.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderExcessive homeworkLittle learningDismissive attitudeDrop risk
  • The only review calls this the .
  • Students report .
  • The reviewer dropped and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Tough-grader tags, max difficulty, and a A look unrealistic.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Difficulty is rated 5 and the student felt the class assumed prior fashion knowledge.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The and explicitly tells others not to learn from this class.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

and feedback experience.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Lots of student.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Described as laughing at students and acting as if beginners should already know fashion.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

; exams are not described.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person review describes laughing at students, excessive homework, no real learning, and a .

Main concern

Hostile tone, high workload, and no perceived skill gain.

What students said

“I'd like to say this class was the worse class I've ever taken!”
FD56

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Believe me if you . Luckily I dropped this class!”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting negative teaching and workload claims. Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Disaster

12/100

“I'd like to say this class was the worse class I've ever taken!”

📚 Overwhelming Workload

12/100

“ and 0 result and outcome.”

👎

5/100

“Believe me if you .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • laughing to students
  • behaving like students should know about Fashion before taking this class
  • Worse class I've ever taken

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and 0 result and outcome
  • Luckily I dropped this class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

A single highly negative review from 2020 provides detail but no corroborating sample.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

FD561 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1