AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Javy Galindo

PHIL022 · PHIL110 · PHIL001 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take him if you will do the readings and show up; if you want a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture heavyGet ready to readGives good feedbackExtra credit availableMandatory attendance
  • Caring, energetic philosophy and .
  • Daily discussion and and grades.
  • Midterms and and multi-part writing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

and , but closed-note multi-part exams mean an A still takes consistent reading and exam prep.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is approachable for an intro philosophy course, but , and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory and tags warn that skipping class means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students praise his energy and care, though because of harsh finals.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

and appears, but major exams are closed-note and more demanding.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Daily reading and discussion dominate; formal homework is light, but and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students describe him as energetic, caring, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Light quizzes and short writing exist, but midterms and and no notes drive the grade risk.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person philosophy sections feel engaging and but and demanding closed-note exams.

Main concern

No-notes midterms and to lighter quizzes.

What students said

“He's an amazing professor who actually cares about you and his subject.”
PHIL001
“ and final require 2 short response questions, 20 multiple choice questions AND a 3 paragraph minimum essay, NO NOTES”
PHIL022
“Be prepared .”
PHIL110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but and multi-part.

No notes on midterm and finalShort responses plus multiple choiceMinimum essay requirementQuiz corrections allowed

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a multi-paragraph essay with no notes.

No notesEssay componentMultiple choiceQuiz corrections
“ and final require 2 short response questions, 20 multiple choice questions AND a 3 paragraph minimum essay, NO NOTES”
PHIL022
“ and .”
PHIL022

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's an amazing professor who actually cares about you and his subject.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 , and strict exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“He's an amazing teacher, and tries to engage students which is difficult for a 7:45 AM class”

📖 Reading Load

55/100

“Be prepared .”

📝

34/100

“ and final require 2 short response questions, 20 multiple choice questions AND a 3 paragraph minimum essay, NO NOTES”

👍 Recommendation

76/100

“ required articles and chapters”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He has a lot of energy and tries to engage the students
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and .
  • NO NOTES, which I think isn't reasonable.
  • Be prepared .

Theme 3

📅

  • Yes
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed reviews are consistent on teaching style and attendance, but the sample is small and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL0012 reviews
PHIL0221 review
PHIL1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values