AI Rate Professor

Communication

Anne Samuel

COMM01 · COMM12 · COMM012 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want an easy comm credit and can tolerate lecture-heavy class time.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyLight WorkloadMandatory AttendanceExtra CreditMixed TeachingGroup Projects
  • Two strong , and confidence gains in speaking.
  • One critical review says lectures are self-focused, dated, and left them more nervous.
  • and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students report little work, , rewrites, and A grades with limited assignments.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Content is mostly speeches and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Every review that .

In-person only; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

and one would not; praise and complaints roughly split.

Recommendation split appears only in in-person comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Graded by few things, rewrites allowed, and offered when students try hard.

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Workload

Light

82/100

, and light overall load.

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

and confidence building for some; self-focused, dated lectures for others.

Format shift

In-person mixed tone only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Partner and group projects, essays, and speeches dominate over formal exams.

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person only; light workload and and weak skill growth for others.

Main concern

and uneven lecture quality across sections.

What students said

“there was so little work to do that the class was super easy to pass.”
COMM01
“She talks A LOT about herself/experiences and often goes off on tangents which I found boring”
COMM12
“She and her lectures are fun.”
COMM012

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on projects and .

Group ProjectsEssaysSpeechesExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews describe projects, essays, and .

Group ProjectsEssaysPartner Project
“1 partner project, 2 group projects , and 1 essay.”
COMM12
“She and her lectures are fun.”
COMM012

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“there was so little work to do that the class was super easy to pass. Ms. Samuel is also very easy to learn from. Great overall!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews with mixed praise and criticism. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“She talks A LOT about herself/experiences and often goes off on tangents which I found boring”

🅰️ Easy Pass

82/100

“there was so little work to do that the class was super easy to pass.”

👍 Recommendation Split

64/100

“ if I needed to and I like the small class feeling.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her lectures are fun
  • teaching style and material is old
  • very easy to learn from

Theme 2

📈 About Workload and Grades

  • so little work to do that the class was super easy to pass
  • Gives out if you try really hard
  • Graded by few things

Theme 3

🗣️ About Outcomes

  • She opened my eyes to the world and I can now communicate with other people much better
  • more nervous to communicate w/ people than when I entered it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews with mixed polarity and limited grade detail keep confidence low.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COMM011 review
COMM0121 review
COMM121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values