AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Maria Earle

CIST0041A · CIST4A1 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

not learn coding fundamentals and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProReads From SlidesNo Real CodingAbsurd ProjectsTough GraderNot Beginner Friendly
  • All three reviews rate quality 1 and
  • Intro Java lectures read from book or
  • while basics are barely taught

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

and an A only from 93-100 make high marks very hard in a poorly taught intro class.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Labeled intro Java but projects and pace feel advanced while basics are skipped.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as mandatory, though students say skipping may teach more than lectures.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Every and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Tagged tough grader with only 93-100 counting as an A.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Absurd multi-feature projects and group work on top of dense reading.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Lectures are book or and vague project instructions.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Heavy emphasis on projects and group work rather than guided coding exams.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Students report slide-reading lectures, almost no live coding, vague instructions, and .

Main concern

Intro course skips basics yet assigns advanced multi-feature projects with a strict A scale.

What students said

“I did not see a single line of ACTUAL code in class.”
CIST4A1
“Her lectures are straight out of the book and you could get away with skipping class, you'll probably learn more that way anyway.”
CIST4A1
“all she ; terrible teaching style and vague instructions.”
CIST0041A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lectures and do not clearly describe exam policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I did not see a single line of ACTUAL code in class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews highlighting weak intro teaching and harsh projects. Credibility rating: Medium.

👎 Teaching Quality

12/100

“During lectures, all she ; terrible teaching style and vague instructions.”

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“ ”

💻 Project Overload

20/100

“We can hardly code, yet now she wants a tiered login system with file storage, MESSAGING, etc?!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She just reads from the book ABOUT code.
  • Her lectures are straight out of the book
  • terrible teaching style and vague instructions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and only 93-100 is an A.
  • absurd requirements
  • Good for maybe intermediate, and advanced programmers, but NOT beginners.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three consistent highly negative in-person reviews with concrete teaching and project details, but small sample size.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CIST4A12 reviews
CIST0041A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values