AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Tejal Desai-Naik

MATH106 · MATH14 · MATH10 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Consider her if and , but skip if you need an easy or lenient math class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerMixed reviewsExplains math wellTough graderHomework heavyWork for your A
  • Reviews split between strong praise for and a .
  • Getting an A is not easy; students say you must work for it.
  • Sample is only three reviews, so confidence is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Comments say an A is not easy and .

All evidence is in person from three reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-range and students describe real work rather than trivial content.

All evidence is in person from three reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

, but and you will not pass.

All evidence is in person; signals conflict on a tiny sample.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

, while the latest says no good and .

All evidence is in person from three mixed reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

and work-for-A comments outweigh the limited positive grade signals.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of and students emphasize real effort for grades.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Praise for and no-good review.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

Homework emphasis is explicit; .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person math reviews range from highly recommended and and a no-good rating.

Main concern

Inconsistent student experiences and .

What students said

“She's great! So actually have to work for it.”
MATH106
“ ! and is very prompt to responding to emails!”
MATH10
“No good”
MATH14

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

reviews.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's great! So actually have to work for it. But she's willing to help.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews with conflicting tones. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

55/100

“ and is very prompt to responding to emails!”

⚖️

34/100

“not easy to get an A you actually have to work for it.”

👎 Negative Signal

20/100

“No good”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • She's great! So helpful
  • and is very prompt to responding to emails!
  • No good

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • not easy to get an A you actually have to work for it.
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews across many years with sharply mixed opinions reduce reliability.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH101 review
MATH1061 review
MATH141 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values