AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ed Lodi

MATH106 · MATHMATH · MATH1 · MAT02 · MATH4771 · MA106 · MATH002 · MATH001 · MATH3A · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

unless and double-check every graded item.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCan't TeachHarsh Grading ErrorsTest HeavyLots of HomeworkSelf-Teach Required
  • Students and and lecture mistakes.
  • Workload and tests feel heavy while support and .
  • ; most advise avoiding him entirely.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

Tough grading, test mismatch, homework penalties, and frequent D or .

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Students call the class extremely hard mainly because concepts are not taught clearly and pace assumes prior mastery.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Multiple tags and comments say skip class and you will not pass, with .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Comments are overwhelmingly do-not-take with 0% would-take-again and repeated teaching-disaster language.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

Students report , and mistakes that lower scores.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Lots of homework and feel crushing.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Dominant theme is unclear teaching, board errors, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and exam outcomes over supportive practice.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math classes are widely described as , and and poor support.

Main concern

, and tests that do not match what was taught.

What students said

“Absolutely garbage professor. .”
MATH106
“Can't teach, period. Students constantly have to correct him bc he can't keep the material straight. !”
MA106
“Basically you have to teach yourself or be in tutoring everyday.”
MATH106

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes and and error-prone grading.

Test HeavyHarsh Exam GradingMaterial Mismatch

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as hard, test-heavy, and inconsistently graded against unclear class content.

Test HeavyGrading MistakesLecture-Test Mismatch
“the material he covers and the content of the .”
MATH106
“ rush so "there's probably lots of mistakes").”
MA106

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't even bother with him unless he seriously matures”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 in-person reviews with strong consensus on poor teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Quality

12/100

“ , CONSISTENTLY WRONG WITH GRADING PROBLEMS!!!”

📉 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ .”

⚖️

14/100

“Ridiculous grading of homework (less than 50% credit for having 80% of it done correctly)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Shouldn't be teaching.
  • he once told the class "i don't understand why you don't understand".
  • He doesnt tell you HOW to do the problem, just that you should know it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • more than half of the students in his class dropped
  • Be prepared to double check your grades because you may actually have scored higher than you were graded.
  • BECAUSE I DID NOT UNDERSTAND A THING!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support & Tone

  • Never fully explaining concepts and consistently insults his students.
  • he doesn't answer emails.
  • demeans students and puts them on blast if they have a question to ask.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews spanning many years are highly consistent in negative teaching and .

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH1067 reviews
MATH0014 reviews
MATH3A2 reviews
MA1061 review
MAT021 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH0021 review
MATH11 review
MATH47711 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 1