AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Lisa Kaaz

KEYBOARDING · CA10D · CA10 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Strong pick for keyboarding or first online tech classes if you want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyExtremely HelpfulFast Email RepliesCaring MentorGreat Online SupportEncouraging
  • Nearly universal praise for communication, patience, and real skill-building in keyboarding and formatting.
  • She is flexible with corrections and and on campus.
  • Workload is moderate and fair; a few .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many call the class a breeze, but others say you still work for the grade and document standards can be strict.

One online review is positive on teaching; ease themes mainly come from in-person-tagged CA10D comments that still describe online sections.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Keyboarding and , though not effort-free for everyone.

Difficulty reports are similar across the one online and many in-person-tagged reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

The only review that mentions attendance marks it mandatory; most others .

review; in-person reviews rarely mention it.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

, and lasting practical skills.

Strong recommendation holds in both the online-tagged review and in-person-tagged set.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Allows resubmissions and corrections; one .

Format shift

Leniency comments appear mainly in in-person-tagged reviews of online sections.

Workload

Light

70/100

Often described as a breeze with steady practice work rather than crushing volume.

Format shift

Workload tone is consistent across formats with limited online sample size.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Students repeatedly , and genuine care for success.

Format shift

Both online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Keyboarding and document formatting practice dominate; tests exist but are less central in comments.

Format shift

and in-person-tagged reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Most reviews (many describing online CA10D , and highly recommended for keyboarding skills.

Main concern

Occasional notes of and end-of-term disorganization.

What students said

“She was the sweetest teacher. I misunderstood a formatting requirement and she let me fix all of .”
CA10D
“I think this instructor is the best. She cares about her students and will take the extra time to .”
CA10D
“Great online teacher. Anyone who wants to learn to type or improve their skills in .”
CA10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Single tagged-online review , and .

Main concern

Only one explicitly online-tagged review limits confidence on pure online logistics.

What students said

“Very good with communication, and very friendly. She and even the website as fun and amusing as can be.”
CA10D

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Comments mention tests that can be engaging, but .

Fun TestsDocument Formatting ChecksPractice-Based

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person-tagged reviews emphasize document standards and skill .

Document Formatting ChecksPractice-Based
“This class and she is too strict on the .”
CA10D

Online

One online review notes she makes tests and the website fun while covering material well.

Fun TestsClear Communication
“She and even the website as fun and amusing as can be.”
CA10D

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She cares about her students and will take the extra time to .”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews (1 online, 14 in-person), highlighting care, communication, and practical skills. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“She teaches and covers the material very well and goes out of her way to help you understand it.”

💬 Communication

95/100

“The instructor answered your e-mails very quickly and is wiling to meet with you on campus or online.”

❤️ Student Care

94/100

“You can tell that she really cares for her student's success.”

👍 Recommendation

92/100

“I highly recomment her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great instructor! Helpful and nice. Always willing to help.
  • Even though I took this class online, I felt I was in a class room.
  • Very Nice and

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • She was the sweetest teacher.
  • Compasionate and understanding, but still makes you work for the grade.
  • She is a very good and helpful instructor.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Great online course. Was a breeze.
  • still makes you work for the grade
  • she is too strict on the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews with highly consistent praise raise confidence, but most are older (2004-2014) and only one is explicitly online-tagged.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CA10D12 reviews
CA102 reviews
KEYBOARDING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values