AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Rika Fabian

SOC020 · SOC001 · SOC20 · SOCIO001 · SOC101 · SOC1 · SOC01 · SOC002 · SOCIO2 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Only take Fabian if and ; skip her for an easy GE or rushed online term.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy ReadingHard ExamsTough GraderPassionate But ScatteredParticipation Key
  • Midterms and and often decide the grade.
  • , and frequent participation demands.
  • Students split between finding her passionate and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Tough, often write-in exams and and quizzes feel easier.

Both online and and finals; and writing load.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

, and uneven lecture clarity make the content feel hard for many students.

Online comments focus on reading volume; and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Multiple students say you must attend because lectures are not posted and participation is graded.

; online reviews do not describe flexible attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Passionate fans exist, but many warn of , and , so fit depends on grit.

Online reviewers lean against recommending short online terms; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Called a , though essays and article summaries can be graded easier.

Format shift

Online reviews call her a ; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of assigned reading, reading quizzes, essays or summaries, plus high-stakes exams.

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

Some love her passion and discussion style; others find her rude, contradictory, or disorganized.

Format shift

and lecture clarity; online reviews focus more on workload.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and finals, supported by reading quizzes, essays, and participation.

Format shift

Both formats highlight difficult midterms and finals as the main risk.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and participation; and teaching clarity is mixed.

Main concern

Scattered lectures, language barriers, and .

What students said

“Must attend class. Lectures are not posted online.”
SOC1
“ , but her mid-term and !!!!”
SOC20
“She was all over the place. He ”
SOC001

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online and writing while midterms and .

Main concern

formats a poor fit.

What students said

“The midterms and the . You have to be really careful, and you can't rush them.”
SOC001
“A lot of reading and writing. as the exams are extremely difficult.”
SOC1
“Assigns a lot of reading and is a .”
SOC001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are repeatedly described as extremely hard, often short-answer or conceptual rather than easy multiple choice.

Hard MidtermsHard FinalsWrite-In AnswersReading Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and rely on notes because lectures may not be posted.

Hard MidtermsHard FinalsWrite-In AnswersStudy Guides
“her mid-term and !!!!”
SOC20
“ write in answers, and she is a .”
SOC1

Online

Online students say midterms and finals are super hard and not suited to rushed winter or summer terms.

Hard MidtermsHard FinalsHeavy Reading
“The midterms and the . You have to be really careful, and you can't rush them.”
SOC001
“ as the exams are extremely difficult.”
SOC1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but her mid-term and !!!! And this class required a lot of reading!!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews (3 online, 16 in-person), , and mixed teaching clarity. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

46/100

“Rika is rude, condescending and all over the place.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“A lot of reading and writing.”

📝

28/100

“The midterms and the .”

❤️ Passion Praise

70/100

“She's really passionate about the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Fun teacher, fun class.
  • She was all over the place.
  • She contradicts herself half the time

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • difficult class to get an a in. more than half dropped the class
  • She's not easy.
  • she is a

Theme 3

📚

  • She gives a lot of reading.
  • this class required a lot of reading!!!!!
  • Must attend class. Lectures are not posted online.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews across online and in-person formats from 2010-2014 give rich, consistent evidence on hard exams and .

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

SOC0017 reviews
SOC0023 reviews
SOC13 reviews
SOC011 review
SOC0201 review
Show 4 more courses
SOC1011 review
SOC201 review
SOCIO0011 review
SOCIO21 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values