AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jim Wilczak

MATHEMATICS · MATH10STATS · MATH003B · MATH903 · STATSMATH10 · MATH001 · MATH10 · CALC3B · STATSSECT · MATH3B · CALCULUS · CALC · STATISTICS · STATISTIC · STATS · MATH301 · MATH106R · MATH3R · INTALGEBRA · MATH · MATH010 · MATH3A · 51 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you will , and can handle a strict, high-school-style classroom.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrict AttendancePlays FavoritesHard GraderDaily Homework ChecksPartial Credit
  • some call him excellent and clear; many call him rude, irritable, and unhelpful.
  • Attendance and daily homework checks are strict, with late or .
  • , though some note partial credit and notebook use.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Passing is possible with consistent homework and study, but and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Material ranges from manageable stats to tough calc tests that often feel harder than the homework.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Students repeatedly say , and leaving early, with missed classes setting you back.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

and partial credit, others urge avoiding him for rudeness and favorites.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Many call him a ; a minority note partial credit on exams.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

, and online homework add up for many students.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

; many others report boredom, mistakes, arrogance, or poor help.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

, but and sometimes do not match homework problems.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person math and stats classes are strict on attendance and homework; teaching and rude, favoritism-heavy experiences.

Main concern

Mood, favorites, and unfair.

What students said

“He is tough but fair and expects you to put in the hard work in order to achieve success in the class.”
MATH903
“Horrible teacher... he picks favorites and makes the class endurably boring.”
MATH301
“Mr. .”
MATH10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; and partial credit, but many find tests hard or poorly aligned.

In-Person TestsHomework Notebook AllowedPartial CreditTricky WordingTests Differ From HW

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and partial credit, yet students often say problems differ from homework and .

Homework Notebook AllowedPartial CreditTricky TestsHard Grading
“ . It's rare that he will put a weird question on the test, but it's been known to happen.”
MATH003B
“He lets you use your hw notebooks on the tests but it isn't that helpful because he writes the problems on the .”
STATISTICS
“The but he gives lots of partial credit.”
MATH10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Wilczak is an EXCELLENT instructor. He is tough but fair and expects you to put in the hard work in order to achieve success in the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting polarization in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“ . He's a natural at it.”

⚠️ Favoritism Risk

28/100

“It all depends if he likes you or not, if he does then you will do fine and if you dont then you are going to have some real problems.”

📅

22/100

“Mr. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Explaines everything clearly and will go over things multiple times if needed.
  • unclear and unhelpful at tiomes
  • he doesnt really teach. just assigns work.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • gives lots of

Theme 3

😠 About Classroom Climate

  • he picks favorites
  • Has the sensitivity of a four year old girl.
  • TOTAL ****!!! HE TREATS COLLEGE STUDENTS LIKE HIGH SCHOOL KIDS!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

51

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed in-person reviews spanning many years show a consistent polarization pattern with rich behavioral detail.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 515
3 out of 58
2 out of 511
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH1014 reviews
MATH3A7 reviews
MATH3B5 reviews
STATS4 reviews
CALC3B2 reviews
Show 17 more courses
STATISTICS2 reviews
CALC1 review
CALCULUS1 review
INTALGEBRA1 review
MATH1 review
MATH0011 review
MATH003B1 review
MATH0101 review
MATH106R1 review
MATH10STATS1 review
MATH3011 review
MATH3R1 review
MATH9031 review
MATHEMATICS1 review
STATISTIC1 review
STATSMATH101 review
STATSSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values