AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

William Langlois

MATH106 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

if you can; content knowledge is fine, but help is limited and .

Best fit · Budget FirstHard of HearingNot Very HelpfulMyMathLab RequiredKnows ContentBetter Options Available
  • Students say he knows the material but is hard to get help from due to hearing issues.
  • MyMathLab is required mainly for homework and feels like a money waste.
  • The only review advises that .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Difficulty is rated very low, but no student claims an automatic A and help is limited.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Difficulty rating is 1 and no comments describe hard concepts.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

The reviewer says there are better teachers and flags poor help plus wasted software cost.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

; complaints focus on help and cost instead.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Light

70/100

and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

He knows the subject but hearing limits make him hard to get help from.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

MyMathLab is used mainly for .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Budget First

One in-person MATH106 review calls him knowledgeable but unhelpful and criticizes MyMathLab costs.

Main concern

Hard of hearing and .

What students said

“He is smart and knows what he is talking about, but is hard of hearing and because of it.”
MATH106

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There are better teachers.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting help limits and MyMathLab cost. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Helpfulness

34/100

“He is smart and knows what he is talking about, but is hard of hearing and because of it.”

💸 Cost Concern

30/100

“He uses MyMathLab instead of just Angel which is a huge waste of money and it was only used for homework.”

👎 Recommendation

28/100

“There are better teachers.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is smart and knows what he is talking about
  • because of it

Theme 2

💸 About Cost and Tools

  • He uses MyMathLab instead of just Angel which is a huge waste of money
  • it was only used for homework

Theme 3

📉 About Overall Value

  • There are better teachers.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

24/100

Evidence confidence

A single older review with limited detail makes confidence low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values