AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

G Hirakawa

MATH · MATHD · MATH106 · MATH104 · MATH106R · ALGINT · MATH903 · PRECALCULUS · MATH8241 · MATH002 · MATH001 · MATH000D · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want clear math teaching and are willing to put in and long test sittings.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear explanationsNotes allowed on testsLong examsSarcastic humorHelpful if you ask
  • Very clear math teaching that turns tough topics into something learnable
  • , but notes and
  • , and ask questions to stay on track

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

, and using allowed notes on tests makes an A realistic for many students.

; no online reviews were available.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

and algebra depending on the course and student background.

; no online reviews were available.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

, but students say missing class or staying shy about questions hurts grades.

; no online reviews were available.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Most students praise clarity and and occasional sarcasm.

; no online reviews were available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

, and a generous scale help students who put in the work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Homework and practice problems are manageable, but .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Students , and one of their best math teachers.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Long in-class tests drive outcomes, with homework and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and support, with recurring notes about long tests and occasional sarcasm.

Main concern

and occasional dismissive sarcasm when questions are asked.

What students said

“lets , and he has a sense of humor! if you do the assigned work and make good notes - easy A”
MATH106
“Great teacher! . Learned a lot but the .”
MATH000D
“ . Some more than 100 questions.”
MATH104

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and challenging, but notes and .

Notes allowedLong examsCurved testsIn-person tests

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

notes allowed and .

Notes allowedLong examsCurved tests
“lets ”
MATH106
“ . Some more than 100 questions.”
MATH104
“ and well.”
MATH106

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“great teacher! easy to understand, shows more than one way to do things, lets , and he has a sense of humor! if you do the assigned work and make good notes - easy A”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 in-person reviews spanning 2004-2013, highlighting teaching clarity, exam length, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

86/100

“A truly great teacher. , and encouraging.”

📝

76/100

“lets , and he has a sense of humor! if you do the assigned work and make good notes - easy A”

⏱️ Long Exams

55/100

“ . Some more than 100 questions.”

👍

80/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and encouraging.
  • He's pretty darn col, tells it like it is. .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you do the assigned work and make good notes - easy A
  • the
  • and well.

Theme 3

😄 About Personality

  • Funny/interesting teacher.
  • he has a sense of humor
  • He can be sarcastic.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

, but all are from 2004-2013 with limited grade data.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1064 reviews
MATH1042 reviews
MATH9032 reviews
ALGINT1 review
MATH1 review
Show 7 more courses
MATH000D1 review
MATH0011 review
MATH0021 review
MATH106R1 review
MATH82411 review
MATHD1 review
PRECALCULUS1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1