AI Rate Professor

Design

Robert Anthony

PHOTOSHOPDESIG · FLASH4729 · FLASHONLINE · DMIS010C · DMIS007 · PHOTO010 · DMIS · DMIS57A · PHOTOSHOP · DMIS62B · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Only take him for basic design or photo if you can self-teach; these reviews.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHit-or-miss qualityUnprepared in some coursesHelpful and patient for someClear when organizedNot ideal for advanced Flash
  • Reviews are sharply split between loving his humor and patience and calling him unprepared.
  • ; advanced Flash reviews are very negative.
  • Several students say he is nice but they needed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

No free-A signals; difficulty ratings and and frustration.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty sits mid-range overall, but advanced Flash sections feel harder and poorly supported.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

some design students love him, advanced Flash students strongly warn against him.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Comments focus more on teaching clarity and preparation than on harsh or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Some mention unfinished assignments and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

About half praise clarity and humor; half report unprepared demos, poor answers, and wasted tuition.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews emphasize projects, demos, and class assignments more than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some call him organized, clear, and a must-take for graphic design, while others .

Main concern

Inconsistent preparation and weak technical depth in advanced software courses.

What students said

“This is a if you are interested in the Graphic Design field.”
DMIS007
“Unprepared and not qualified to teach a course like Flash.”
FLASH4729
“ . It's waste of time.”
DMIS62B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment appears driven by assignments and demos instead.

Little exam detailAssignment-focused coursesUnclear follow-through on tasks

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and instead focus on demos, assignments, and preparation quality.

Assignment-focusedUnclear task follow-through
“ and never follows through with them.”
FLASH4729
“He didn't prepare any materials for the .”
DMIS62B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unprepared and not qualified to teach a course like Flash. . It's waste of time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews, highlighting the and failed advanced software courses. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality Split

42/100

“ ”

👍 When He Works

70/100

“Awesome teacher! and has a great sense of humor!”

⚠️ Advanced Course Risk

25/100

“He was incapable of teaching the advanced flash class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and has a great sense of humor
  • Patient and helpful

Theme 2

📉 About Weak Prep

  • Unprepared and not qualified to teach a course like Flash
  • He didn't prepare any materials for the

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • he is a very understanding teacher nice guy as well
  • Has a sense of humor and keeps a banter going
  • He's not terrible, but he's not great either

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews give a decent sample with polarized but repeated themes; many are older (2004-2013), which lowers confidence.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PHOTOSHOP2 reviews
DMIS1 review
DMIS0071 review
DMIS010C1 review
DMIS57A1 review
Show 5 more courses
DMIS62B1 review
FLASH47291 review
FLASHONLINE1 review
PHOTO0101 review
PHOTOSHOPDESIG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values