AI Rate Professor

English

Shannon Hays

ENG1A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Take her if you want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyStudent-CenteredHighly RecommendedClear ExplanationsTalks FastReasonable Workload
  • Students praise her care for students and .
  • Course is easy with only a decent amount of work if you participate.
  • Single glowing review strongly recommends taking her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Difficulty is rated 1 and students call her very reasonable with only a decent workload.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Course difficulty is 1 and the only review describes it as manageable with class discussion.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

; students are told to participate in class discussions.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

The sole review ends with a strong personal recommendation and 5/5 quality.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Described as very reasonable with low difficulty and .

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Workload

Light

72/100

Decent amount of work if you participate; not portrayed as heavy.

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Praised as a great instructor who cares and makes a lot of sense despite talking fast.

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Class discussion participation is emphasized; exams and .

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person ENG1A feels supportive and easy; she talks fast but makes sense and cares about students.

Main concern

She talks a bit fast; you need to participate in discussions.

What students said

“Great instructor. Very reasonable and more importantly, cares for her students.”
ENG1A
“ .”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great instructor. Very reasonable and more importantly, cares for her students. She talks a bit fast but makes a lot of sense.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting care and ease. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Great instructor. Very reasonable and more importantly, cares for her students.”

👍 Recommendation

92/100

“ .”

📘 Workload

72/100

“Decent amount of work, just make sure you participate in class discussions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • cares for her students
  • talks a bit fast but makes a lot of sense
  • Great instructor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very reasonable
  • Decent amount of work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed review from 2012; high detail but tiny sample and old date limit confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values