AI Rate Professor

Interior Design

Sandra Livingston

INTFINISHMAT · ID005 · ID25INTFINMA · ID05 · ID · ID25 · ID1 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Avoid if you want to learn interior design; .

Best fit · Easy A HunterDisorganizedTextbook ReaderEasy GradeWeak Teaching SkillsPersonal Stories
  • Most and a poor classroom teacher.
  • Classes are often easy grades even when little is learned.
  • She reads from the book, shares personal ID stories, and sometimes gives incorrect information.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Multiple students report easy A grades despite poor teaching and low learning.

All evidence is from in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Students repeatedly call the class easy and low-content, with light intellectual challenge.

All evidence is from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

All evidence is from in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most detailed comments urge avoiding her unless you only want an easy grade.

All evidence is from in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students report good or A grades even when they learned almost nothing.

Format shift

All evidence is from in-person reviews.

Workload

Light

70/100

Overall portrayed as easy with limited productive class time rather than heavy projects.

Format shift

All evidence is from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Common themes are disorganization, reading the textbook, wrong information, and weak presentation.

Format shift

All evidence is from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of textbook-based lectures, papers, and .

Format shift

All evidence is from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person ID courses feel easy but unfocused: , and little skill transfer.

Main concern

Disorganization, incorrect information, and almost no real teaching value.

What students said

“ .”
ID25
“ if you want an easy A, if you are passionate about interior design, and are coming to learn... try to avoid her!”
ID05
“The . Her lectures consist of reading the text book to the class.”
ID005

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

One review says the exam had nothing to do with what was taught or assigned; .

Exams Mismatch Material

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Limited in-person evidence notes exams that did not match lectures or readings.

Exams Mismatch Material
“ taught us or had us read.”
ID1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want an easy A, if you are passionate about interior design, and are coming to learn... try to avoid her!”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person reviews, highlighting disorganization and easy grades. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She is a good designer, but a HORRIBLE teacher.”

🅰️ Easy A

80/100

“still I got an A in the class!”

👎 Recommendation

30/100

“ unless you are prepared to teach yoiurself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures consist of
  • frequently gave incorrect information

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the class is easy
  • easy A
  • I got a good grade from her, so not bitter about that, I just didn't learn anything!!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Nice lady
  • I Love Her!!
  • I find her quite charming

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

12 reviews from 2004-2011 show consistent disorganization and easy-grade themes, but ages and sparse grade data lower certainty.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ID053 reviews
ID253 reviews
241431 review
ID1 review
ID0051 review
Show 3 more courses
ID11 review
ID25INTFINMA1 review
INTFINISHMAT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values