AI Rate Professor

Interior Design

Greg Anton

HISAHISB · ID35A · ID35 · ID35B · IDABC · ID65A · HISTORYFURNITU · ID35AB · HISTOFFURN · HISTORYOFFURN · ID35AID35B · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him only if , and accept a polarizing lecture style.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPassionate but polarizingNo handouts stressNote-taking heavyLong improvised lecturesKnows furniture history
  • Highly knowledgeable and passionate about interior design and furniture history
  • some love note-drawing; others find lectures late, long, and poorly structured
  • Grades and and heavy self-note-taking

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Getting a , and a stressful furniture binder project, with at least one reported D+.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Furniture history and period identification are detailed and fast, and many students find lectures dense and hard to retain without handouts.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Students say you must attend class to know test answers and that lectures run long past advertised time.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Some call him a great passionate instructor while others found the class amateurish, late, and not as catalog-described.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

as harsh overall, but outcomes include a D+ and and projects.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students must draw slides without handouts, sit through long lectures, and complete a stressful furniture binder project.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

He clearly knows the material and shows passion, but improvisation, lateness, and sparse materials frustrate many students.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment mixes tests that project.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person furniture and interior design history courses feel knowledge-rich but uneven, with praise for passion and criticism for late, improvised, handout-free lectures.

Main concern

Stress from drawing every slide, long overruns, and .

What students said

“Seems to be divorced from reality, consistently late, lectures improvised, hours wasted with muttering”
IDABC
“Excellent Instructor. Really knows his stuff and is passionate about teaching it. !”
ID35
“Did not give enouph handouts. Students because he would not supply handouts.”
HISTORYFURNITU

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests reward those who attend and take notes; a .

Attendance-based testsFinal furniture binder projectIn-person lectures

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and attendance; the furniture binder final project is repeatedly called stressful.

Attendance required for testsFurniture binder finalNo handout support
“MUST ATTEND TO THE CLASS IN ORDER TO KNOW THE ANSWER FOR TEST.”
HISTOFFURN
“ .”
HISTOFFURN

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Excellent Instructor. Really knows his stuff and is passionate about teaching it. ! He is interested in your learning more than the tests and other junk!”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person reviews spanning 2003-2012, highlighting passion versus structure complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Subject Mastery

78/100

“KNOWS HIS MATERIAL VERY VERY WELL.”

📝 Handout Frustration

34/100

“Did not give enouph handouts. Students because he would not supply handouts.”

⚖️ Polarized Recommendation

55/100

“Greg is a great instructor although I have heard people complain about his teaching style.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teacher passionate about subject.
  • lectures improvised, hours wasted with muttering
  • LECTURE IS BOARING AND LONG.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • MUST ATTEND TO THE CLASS IN ORDER TO KNOW THE ANSWER FOR TEST.
  • Class lectures extended way beyond advertised time.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • ABSOLUTELY LOVE LOVE LOVE HIM!!!!! HE IS AN AWESOME TEACHER WITH A GREAT SENSE OF HUMOR
  • Greg Is a great teacher.
  • Amateurish, and smug style.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve mostly detailed but very old (2003-2012) in-person reviews show mixed consistency, lowering overall confidence.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ID352 reviews
HISAHISB1 review
HISTOFFURN1 review
HISTORYFURNITU1 review
HISTORYOFFURN1 review
Show 6 more courses
ID35A1 review
ID35AB1 review
ID35AID35B1 review
ID35B1 review
ID65A1 review
IDABC1 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values