AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Nikola Djordjevich

ENG10 · ENGR10 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Solid pick for engineering intro if you put in the work and bring some math or physics background.

Best fit · Effort For RewardIndustry VeteranHomework-Driven AMixed Grading ToneFun and RelaxedKnows His Stuff
  • Strong industry experience and solid knowledge of engineering basics.
  • An A is realistic if , and try; .
  • Reviews are old and mixed, with one very negative outlier.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Students say least a B, but and effort is expected.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

, but others warn you need physics and mid-advanced math beforehand.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most praise knowledge and industry experience and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, but while allowing grade appeals.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Homework, notes, and an endless grind.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many call him knowledgeable, fun, and industry-experienced; a minority say he does not care.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and a walking-on-water project dominate comments more than formal exams.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ENG10/ENGR10 reviews paint a fun, industry-seasoned professor; and pay attention to earn a strong grade, though a .

Main concern

Some need prior physics and mid-advanced math; one student felt ignored and unfairly graded.

What students said

“Do all the homework and .”
ENGR10
“Mr. Djordjevich is a fun, relaxed, and very knowledgable professor.”
ENGR10
“This guy gave me my first B. He is the the class, nor about the students.”
ENG10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews barely describe exams and and a .

Limited exam detailProject-based end work

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; and a doable end project.

Homework-heavyLenient project grading
“End of the and is liniently graded.”
ENGR10
“If you work hard you'll get an "A". Brutal in grading, but allows .”
ENGR10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do all the homework and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews (2004-2010), highlighting knowledge, homework grading, and mixed care; credibility Medium.

🏭 Industry Knowledge

72/100

“Especially good because Mr. Djordjevich is not only a knowledgeable professor, but he has been working in the industry for over 30 years.”

📝 Effort Equals Grade

62/100

“If you get lower than a B then you didn't try at all.”

⚠️

55/100

“Brutal in grading, but allows , and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • fun, relaxed, and very knowledgable professor
  • Very knowledgeable person
  • Nic is a funny teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Do all the homework and
  • Easy. Good teacher. Take this class.
  • If you work hard you'll get an "A"

Theme 3

⚠️ About Negative Experiences

  • He is the the class, nor about the students
  • and mid-advanced mathematics

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed but very old in-person reviews (2004-2010) with mixed tone and no modern online sample.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR104 reviews
ENG103 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values