AI Rate Professor

Communication

Amy Pearson

C1000 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

if you can nail every presentation detail and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderSweet but harshMinimal feedbackParticipation mattersDetail-obsessed
  • Students say she is sweet in person yet grades presentations harshly with .
  • Attention to tiny presentation details can tank scores even after positive verbal comments.
  • Single recent online review shows high difficulty and a C+ outcome.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and scores dropping from verbal praise to 7/15 show an A requires heavy detail work.

Evidence comes only from the single online review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Difficulty rated 5 with presentation detail demands that feel strict and high-stakes.

Evidence comes only from the single online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

The and participation matters.

Evidence comes only from the single online review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Would-take-again is 0% and the student focuses on confusing harsh grades after soft in-class comments.

Evidence comes only from the single online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

; presentation scores can crash despite mild verbal critique.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from the single online review.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Main pain is presentation detail and participation rather than sheer volume of homework.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from the single online review.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Described as sweet in class but and unhelpful when grades land.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from the single online review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades hinge on presentations and attention to delivery details more than exams.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from the single online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online section felt sweet in class but graded presentations harshly with and a low score after praise.

Main concern

Verbal praise does not match strict written grades on presentations.

What students said

“She's sweet BUT she is such a .”
C1000
“SHE GRADES SO BAD but in class she says "you did good" and critiques like one thing and then i come back to a 7/15 like what.”
C1000

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; grading stress centers on presentations.

Presentation-heavy grading

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Reviews ; assessment focus is presentations.

Presentation-heavy grading
“She requires a lot of attention to detail funny enough when doing presentations like standing up and saying the right things.”
C1000

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's sweet BUT she is such a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 online . Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

22/100

“SHE GRADES SO BAD but in class she says "you did good" and critiques like one thing and then i come back to a 7/15 like what.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She's sweet BUT she is such a .”

👎 Recommendation

28/100

“She requires a lot of attention to detail funny enough when doing presentations like standing up and saying the right things.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • i come back to a 7/15 like what

Theme 2

🎤 About Presentations

  • requires a lot of attention to detail
  • doing presentations like standing up and saying the right things
  • Participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one recent online review exists, so patterns cannot be confirmed across students or terms.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

C10001 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values