AI Rate Professor

Art

Heather Murillo

Courses not reported · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

; students consistently , and overwhelming busywork.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderLecture-heavy slidesCrushing homework loadNitpicky gradingDoes not teach
  • Students say she reads slides and plays videos instead of teaching.
  • and nitpicky even when work follows instructions.
  • Workload is heavy with endless redo-style assignments and little learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Even students who follow instructions closely report mid or low grades and constant redo pressure.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

High difficulty ratings and comments about pro-level expectations without teaching make the content hard to navigate.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Every review states attendance was mandatory while lectures .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

6/100

and repeated save yourself warnings dominate every review.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

Students call grading nitpicky and say full-effort work still earns mid or low marks.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Comments describe , and endless redraw-style assignments.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Students , and expects mastery without teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

, and redraws with some test-heavy tags.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person sections feel like slide-and-video sessions with , and .

Main concern

Nitpicky grading and .

What students said

“Not a good teacher, in fact she should not be teaching at all.”
30813
“you can try your hardest and be given mid grade. save yourself and .”
30813
“ and playing embedded videos that she .”
30813

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; tests are mentioned but format details are sparse.

Test heavyIn-person classAssignment-heavy grading

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention test-heavy tags and .

Test heavyHarsh assignment grading
“prepare to not learn anything in class then be given lots n lots of assignments”
30813
“you could follow it exactly, but still won't get full marks.”
30813

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“genuinely just such a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, , and heavy workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

16/100

“Not a good teacher, in fact she should not be teaching at all.”

📚 Workload Overload

12/100

“passive aggressive, petty, fake nice teacher, absurd amount of ”

⚖️

14/100

“you could follow it exactly, but still won't get full marks.”

👎 Recommendation

6/100

“save yourself and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and playing embedded videos
  • she would go through the
  • doesn't teach only shows videos and expects students to be pro level artists

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you can try your hardest and be given mid grade
  • . She's nitpicky.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • So many papers
  • most work i've ever been given in her class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent, detailed, highly consistent negative in-person reviews support a .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

308135 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values