AI Rate Professor

Cabrillo College · Communication Studies

Brielle Plump

ENGR10 · COMM10 · COMM7 · COMM12 · COMM2 · COM12 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
36.36%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take Brielle Plump only if and advocate for yourself.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor FeedbackUnclear InstructionsTough GradingLecture HeavyMixed Energy
  • Online , and disorganized lectures.
  • teaching and harsh grading with poor communication.
  • Grades can be decent, but students describe the path to doing well as frustrating and unclear.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students earned good grades, but , and vague assignments make the A feel unreliable.

Online evidence shows confusion and some high grades, while and harsh grading complaints.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The content is usually manageable, but fast pacing, vague assignments, and subject itself.

Online reviews mention fast pacing and , while and group-work issues.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, but participation and class presence appear to matter in several reviews.

Online reviews emphasize participation and workload, while can hurt performance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

because , and communication are inconsistent.

Online reviews are mostly negative with a few positives, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Multiple students call her a tough or and .

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both contain strict-grading complaints, though .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

, and long lectures, with some students calling it manageable and others heavy.

Format shift

Online reviews mention lots of homework and long lectures, while and fewer graded items.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Her passion and energy help some students, but , and .

Format shift

Online reviews are more negative about organization, while in-person reviews range from .

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

Assessment , and group projects rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, lectures, and written work, while and few graded items.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, with some students praising her energy while others describe poor communication and .

Main concern

Grading and group-work expectations can feel harsh or unclear.

What students said

“Makes everything clear like 10 times over.”
COMM10
“ .”
COMM2
“She will grade you ridiculously harsh for .”
ENGR10

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews lean negative because students describe poor feedback, unclear instructions, long lectures, and .

Main concern

Students may need to figure .

What students said

“Professor and was no help when trying to improve grades.”
COM12
“ focusing on "gotcha!" questions.”
COMM10
“I took the LS version, which moved pretty fast but was manageable!”
COMM12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam and quiz comments suggest tricky coverage and or open-book rules.

Gotcha QuestionsLecture QuizzesShow QuizzesMovie QuizzesMaterial Coverage Complaints

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring rules, or open-book policy.

Online

and several quiz types, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Gotcha QuestionsLecture QuizzesShow QuizzesMovie Quizzes
“ focusing on "gotcha!" questions.”
COMM10
“ .”
COMM12

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor and was no help when trying to improve grades.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“For a communication teacher her level of communication is abysmally low.”

⚖️

28/100

“She will grade you ridiculously harsh for .”

👍 Recommendation Level

38/100

“Took her online class and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Makes everything clear like 10 times over.
  • .
  • , but very passionate about her teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Gives the .
  • .
  • I took the LS version, which moved pretty fast but was manageable!

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • Professor and was no help when trying to improve grades.
  • She was SUPER RUDE when you asked a question.
  • For a communication teacher her level of communication is abysmally low.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across several years and both formats and communication despite some positive outliers.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

COMM104 reviews
COM122 reviews
COMM122 reviews
COMM21 review
COMM71 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGR101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2