AI Rate Professor

Cabrillo College · English

Martin Garcia

ENGL1A · ENG2 · ENGL2 · ENG117329 · ENGLISH1A · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
93.33%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take him if you want a but rewards effort fairly.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrong essay feedbackCaring and supportiveCritical thinking focusParticipation mattersCurrent-events writing
  • , and ability to improve writing.
  • The class is not effortless because essays, readings, and .
  • Grades are generally attainable due to support, , late-work flexibility, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very reachable because many students earned A grades and , and flexibility, but writing effort still matters.

Online evidence is stronger for and late-work flexibility, while in-person evidence shows high grades with more emphasis on participation and readings.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The content is manageable but asks students to read, write often, defend arguments, and think critically.

Online and and discussion demands, with online students more often calling essay prompts tough.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters and group discussion are common, but reviews do .

Both formats emphasize participation, while no review clearly states a .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

93/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and helps them grow as writers.

Both online and , though in-person has the main negative comments about tone and classroom opinions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades appear forgiving because reviews mention generous grading, , late-work flexibility, and many A-range outcomes.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the clearest leniency evidence, while .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload is steady with readings, essays, discussion boards, and participation, but most students do not call it overwhelming.

Format shift

Online reviews range from pretty light work to be prepared to write a lot, while and discussions.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Most students describe him as , and unusually effective at improving writing despite a few concerns about sarcasm and bias.

Format shift

Online reviews are consistently excellent, while but sharper negative minority.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment , and participation, with tests rarely mentioned.

Format shift

Both formats point mainly to writing and discussion, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are , and personal support, with a small concern about sarcasm and classroom viewpoint dynamics.

Main concern

Some students felt he could be sarcastic or strongly opinionated in discussion.

What students said

“ , and that helped me grow academically.”
ENGLISH1A
“He cares about his students and takes the time to help everyone individually.”
ENGL2
“Nice teacher but he can be sarcastic and dislike students very easily.”
ENG2

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students describe him as caring, generous, flexible, and and .

Main concern

Expect substantial writing and though .

What students said

“It was pretty light work and .”
ENG2
“Be prepared to write a lot and I strongly suggest you take advantage of his office hours for extra help.”
ENGL2
“He genuinely cares about the students, wants you to pass, and gives so many opportunities to do well.”
ENG117329

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and may be announced ahead of time, but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book policies.

Rare TestsAdvance NoticeExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and announced ahead of time, but does not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Rare TestsAdvance Notice
“ , but when he does he lets you know ahead of time.”
ENGL2

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He genuinely cares about the students, wants you to pass, and gives so many opportunities to do well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom tone; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“Helped me significantly improve my writing, and inspired me to keep writing.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

93/100

“I would 100% retake it.”

⚖️

78/100

“It was pretty light work and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Martin is one of the !
  • He gives you lots of , and pushes you to become a critical writer and thinker.
  • In class he goes over the readings and helps you understand it even more.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I had trouble writing many of as it was tough.
  • Be prepared to write a lot and I strongly suggest you take advantage of his office hours for extra help.
  • He will also !

Theme 3

❤️ About Support and Character

  • He was very supportive, always available, flexible, and his class.
  • He cares about his students and takes the time to help everyone individually.
  • Nice teacher but he can be sarcastic and dislike students very easily.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 15 recent reviews span multiple years, include both formats, and show consistent praise with a few specific dissenting comments.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG25 reviews
ENGL24 reviews
ENGL1A3 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
ENG1173291 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 5 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values