AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Rhoxanne Morris

ENGINEERING5 · ENGR5 · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
43.9%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you mainly need the credit and can tolerate a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy ADisorganizedMandatory AttendanceGroup ProjectsPolarizing Energy
  • Grades are usually easy, but many students say the and low in substance.
  • Students are sharply and inspiring or loud, insulting, and unprepared.
  • The course relies heavily on , and participation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A appears easy if students attend, participate, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The content is often described as low-level or introductory, but disorganization can make the experience feel harder than the material itself.

Only in-person reviews describe the course, and they generally frame ENGR5 as easy but .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as required or central to success.

, and there is no online attendance evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

44/100

Students recommend her only if they value energy, projects, and .

The recommendation evidence is entirely in person and is strongly split between enthusiastic praise and firm warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Most reported grades are A-range, and students repeatedly say the class is easy to pass with attendance and homework.

Format shift

online grading evidence.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is manageable but , and group projects.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload, so the score reflects that format alone.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Teaching quality is highly polarized, with many students praising her passion while more reviews criticize disorganization, yelling, and .

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person, and no online teaching experience is available.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and occasional group quizzes more than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

disagreement about whether her energy is inspiring or chaotic.

Main concern

The and a loud, sometimes harsh classroom style.

What students said

“as long as you show up and do the ”
ENGR5
“Yes, you'll get an A, but the net gain of knowledge hovers around zero. .”
ENGINEERING5
“Doesn't teach and insulting towards her students.”
ENGR5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention group quizzes but do not clearly prove a midterm, final, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Group QuizzesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, while the broader exam policy is not proven.

Group QuizzesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“We were quizzed on the speakers' presentation next class (group quizzes so befriend sb who takes notes).”
ENGR5

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Yes, you'll get an A, but the net gain of knowledge hovers around zero. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 41 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation patterns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Doesn't teach and insulting towards her students.”

📈 Easy A Reality

86/100

“as long as you show up and do the ”

👍 Recommendation Split

44/100

“Her style definitely isn't for everyone.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the and unclear teacher for sure.
  • Rhoxanne was totally unprepared on a daily basis and was extremely defensive when asked why an obviously relevant topic was left out of a lecture.
  • Rhoxanne is a very enthusiastic and involved professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The class is easy but : "what type of engineering do I want to do?"
  • Yes, you'll get an A, but the net gain of knowledge hovers around zero. .
  • She's super sweet and engr5 was not that hard as long as you went to class and did the homework.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is an incredible instructor she cares about you a lot and has a lot of hope for you
  • She yells a lot and puts people down like they're when they do something wrong.
  • Bold and direct, but caring.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

41

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 41 detailed in-person reviews span 2019 to 2026 and show a consistent polarized pattern.

Inside 41 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 523

Course coverage

ENGR537 reviews
ENGINEERING54 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

28

A+ 8 · A 20

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1