AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Elizabeth Flynn

CHEM1A · ORGANICCHEM · CHEM30A · CHEM30B · CHEM3L · CHEM001A · CHEM3 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take Flynn if you can handle steady work, office hours, and a sometimes strict tone, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing Teaching StyleHeavy WorkloadExtra CreditStrict GradingOffice Hours Matter
  • Student experiences and reports of disorganization or condescension.
  • Grades can be strong because and clear study materials help, but students often describe heavy work and .
  • Online reviews are fewer and slightly more positive overall, while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic because and study guides help, but many students say the workload and .

Online evidence says students must work for the A, while but also harsher grading.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The chemistry content is often manageable, but , and self-teaching make it feel harder for some students.

Online reviews describe a slow but sometimes self-taught class, while chemistry pacing.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

Attendance and participation appear important because students repeatedly warn that .

, while online reviews mostly emphasize office hours and participation rather than strict attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

, and office hours, but many would avoid her due to tone, disorganization, and workload.

Online reviews are slightly more favorable, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

softens the course, but many students call her a tough or .

Format shift

Online reviews mention tough grading less often, while and .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students frequently mention tons of , and major time demands.

Format shift

Both formats mention work, but assignments and labs.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

She is often described as caring and organized, but many students also report confusing, boring, or unhelpful teaching.

Format shift

Online reviews are more positive about patience and office hours, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to come from a mix of , and .

Format shift

, and homework more clearly, while online reviews mainly mention tests and workload.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with many praising clear notes and while , and unapproachability.

Main concern

The main risk is a strict, sometimes unapproachable teaching style paired with heavy weekly work.

What students said

“Do the work and you will succeed, but personally I feel there are better teachers out their.”
CHEM30A
“She is a and she assigns a lot of work.”
CHEM1A

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed but lean positive when students use office hours and accept a slower, work-heavy pace.

Main concern

Some online students found her standoffish and .

What students said

“Elizabeth definitely makes you work for your A, but she's an and tries to create an inclusive atmosphere for her students.”
CHEM30B
“I find myself having to do outside research for the very material she clearly doesn't know how to teach.”
CHEM1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support a and exams helped by study guides or practice exams, but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Study-Guide-Based ExamsPractice Exams AvailableWeekly QuizzesThree Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and clear exams, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book exam rules.

Practice ExamsWeekly QuizzesThree ExamsStudy Guides
“ and helped me average 80% or higher.”
CHEM30A
“Weekley small quizzes, 3 exams are clear if you follow the study guides.”
CHEM3

Online

Online reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove proctoring, .

Tests Not Too Hard
“ and smart.”
CHEM3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Elizabeth definitely makes you work for your A, but she's an and tries to create an inclusive atmosphere for her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She is often described as caring and organized, but many students also report confusing, boring, or unhelpful teaching.”

📈 Grade Effort

62/100

“Do the it really helps.”

⚖️ Workload And Grading

35/100

“She is a and she assigns a lot of work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Elizabeth is fantastic. Her lectures are outlined perfectly for notetakers.
  • .
  • Her lectures are boring and a waste of time, it feels like a high school class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Elizabeth definitely makes you work for your A, but she's an .
  • She gives some .
  • It was an easy class, it doesn't require much effort to succeed.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support And Tone

  • She so wants to help.
  • She is incredibly unapproachable and unpleasant.
  • Every time I asked her a question she made me feel so stupid.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 33 reviews span many years, include both formats, and show detailed but consistently polarized themes.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 55
3 out of 54
2 out of 59
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHEM39 reviews
CHEM30B8 reviews
CHEM30A6 reviews
CHEM1A4 reviews
CHEM3L2 reviews
Show 3 more courses
ORGANICCHEM2 reviews
970281 review
CHEM001A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 5 · A 8 · A- 3

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1