AI Rate Professor

Communication Studies

Maryam Biganeh

COMM1 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

unless you have no alternative and can follow rubrics perfectly without much support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProExtremely Harsh GraderDisorganized CanvasUnclear FeedbackNo LeniencyPoor Communication
  • as severe, with small mistakes causing major grade loss or zeros.
  • and instructions are unclear.
  • unless the credit is unavoidable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

3/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and major penalties for small mistakes.

The online evidence strongly shows a very hard A, while the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The course content is intro-level communication, but unclear instructions and .

Online reviews emphasize confusing Canvas and unclear assignment expectations, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an , but they do mention no makeups and participation matters.

Online reviews mention no makeups and participation matters, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

1/100

Students overwhelmingly do not recommend her because of , and disorganized course setup.

Online reviews are strongly negative and the , though less detailed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

2/100

Students repeatedly say small mistakes lead to zeros or severe grade loss with no room for error.

Format shift

, while the in-person review also labels the course tough but gives fewer details.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

The workload is not described as huge alone, but , and strict requirements make it burdensome.

Format shift

Online reviews mention lots of homework and graded-by-few-things pressure, while the .

Teaching experience

Awful

4/100

Students describe unclear , and little help when confused.

Format shift

Online reviews provide strong negative teaching evidence, while the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

12/100

, and a few major assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

, while the in-person review only mentions turning in work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The as unorganized and easy to submit incorrectly.

Main concern

Organization problems may cause students to submit the wrong materials.

What students said

“ and its very easy to turn in the wrong things”
COMM-1

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report harsh grading, disorganized Canvas , and little grace for mistakes.

Main concern

Strict grading and losing points unexpectedly.

What students said

“If you make one simple mistake, your grade will suffer.”
COMM-1
“ and extremely hard to navigate.”
COMM-1
“No grace for makeups or late work.”
COMM-1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser requirements.

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser requirements.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Teacher runs a tight ship, if you mess up one thing in your assignment you get a flat 0 no leniency.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course organization; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

4/100

“ and and most assignments.”

⚖️

2/100

“You need to do every single thing perfectly for her to give you a decent grade and even then she'll somehow find something to grade you down on.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

1/100

“if !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and concerns.
  • Terrible communication rude talks very slow teaches you nothing.
  • She's extremely vague with .

Theme 2

📉 About Grades

  • Every speech submitted received a zero and was graded very late
  • .
  • Late assignments have a 33% reduction in grade, no make ups, no room for error.

Theme 3

🧭 About Course Organization

  • and extremely hard to navigate.
  • The turn in the wrong thing.
  • and its very easy to turn in the wrong things

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Eight recent reviews from 2025 to 2026 are , and weak communication.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 58

Course coverage

COMM-18 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1