AI Rate Professor

English

Susannah Carney-Waddy

ENG1A · ENG2 · ENGLISH2 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
30.77%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take her only if you are ready for , and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy HomeworkTough GraderCaring but DemandingWriting IntensiveMixed Organization
  • Recent , and strict grading.
  • Positive , and willingness to help students improve.
  • The class appears manageable for disciplined writers but frustrating for students seeking a low-effort English course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students describe frequent homework, many writing tasks, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The English content is not described as conceptually advanced, but the course feels harder because of the pace and volume of reading and writing.

, so the course easiness judgment reflects classroom sections only.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Attendance and participation seem important because students say engagement helps and skipping makes passing harder, though .

online comparison.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

and kindness but often warn against the , and organization issues.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they are split between strong praise and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Recent reviews repeatedly describe strict grading, small mistakes causing mark-downs, and completing work not always leading to an A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Many students describe homework almost every class, frequent reading, group projects, and repeated writing assignments.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Her teaching is mixed because students praise her feedback and care but criticize organization, clarity, workload, and course focus.

Format shift

, and older reviews are more positive than recent ones.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews emphasize , and group projects far more than exams.

Format shift

The assignment-heavy structure is described in in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a demanding writing class with , and some strong praise for feedback and support.

Main concern

The main concern is the amount of homework and writing paired with .

What students said

“This teacher assigns so and class work, she thinks she's my only teacher.”
ENG2
“ and she marks you down for even tiny mistakes.”
ENGLISH2
“Her class and I improved a ton over the semester.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest exam evidence says the class had no tests and only a few book-allowed quizzes, but this .

No Tests Mentioned in One ReviewBook Allowed on QuizzesFew QuizzesEssay-Based Class

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews suggest low exam pressure, but the supported evidence is old and and essays instead of major exams.

No TestsBook Allowed on QuizzesFew Quizzes
“she gives no tests, about 3 quizzes in the begging (get to use book)”
ENG2
“u can use the book on the quizzes.”
ENGLISH2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She and many tedious writing assignments that take 1-2 hours and you have one to do almost everyday.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and credibility rating: High.

📝 Workload Pressure

22/100

“ and takes around 1-2 hours to complete.”

⚖️

28/100

“she marks you down for even tiny mistakes.”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Support

58/100

“Her class and I improved a ton over the semester.”

Theme 1

📝 About Workload

  • This teacher assigns so and class work, she thinks she's my only teacher.
  • assigns at least 3-4 assignments for hw every class
  • She and if you fall behind itll be hard to catch up

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades

  • and she marks you down for even tiny mistakes.
  • If you complete everything that she assigns, then you get a B.
  • she

Theme 3

❤️ About Teaching Style

  • Susannah is an amazing teacher.
  • Super great teacher who truely cares about her students.
  • She is a kind person, but and that can be frustrating.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across many years provide detailed and , and teaching style, though older and newer reviews differ in tone.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1A10 reviews
ENG24 reviews
ENGLISH23 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1