AI Rate Professor

Cabrillo College · Nutrition

Eileen MacKusick

CAHM20 · NUTR20 · CAHM2082670 · NUTR22 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
24%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you can handle , and limited flexibility.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy WorkloadTough GraderUnclear InstructionsExtra Credit AvailableLow Support
  • Students repeatedly describe intro nutrition courses as far more work than expected.
  • , and limited flexibility.
  • A few students earned A grades, but , and assignments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

43/100

A grades are possible, but students repeatedly , and close attention to grading criteria.

Online reviews mention more often, while and many later workload complaints.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The material is intro-level nutrition, but students say the , and expectations make it feel harder than it should.

Online reviews emphasize complex modules and quizzes, while and poor structure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Reviews suggest participation and regular work completion matter heavily, with .

Online evidence centers on required discussions and due dates, while passing.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

because the , and support do not match the course level.

Both formats trend negative, though a few older in-person and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Students frequently call her a tough grader and .

Format shift

Online reviews are especially harsh on grading, while few older lenient outcomes.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Reviews repeatedly mention long videos, readings, discussions, textbook assignments, papers, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online reviews describe dense modules and discussions, while and .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Some students praise feedback and learning, but , and a discouraging class experience.

Format shift

Online reviews are more consistently negative about clarity and support, while but still mostly critical.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear to rely on discussions, quizzes, assignments, textbook work, projects, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions, quizzes, citations, and modules, while , and chapter tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are also mixed to negative, with older positive reviews outweighed , and discouraging grading.

Main concern

The main concern is that and .

What students said

“Lots of .”
NUTR20
“She gives too much work assuming you only live for that class and have no life outside of it.”
CAHM20
“ and if you apply yourself, you should earn an A!”
CAHM20

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints , and tough grading.

Main concern

The main concern is that and harshly graded for an intro nutrition course.

What students said

“Too much work for an intro class.”
NUTR20
“This class has way too much work for entry level nutrition.”
NUTR22
“ and .”
CAHM20

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, tests, and chapter tests, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

QuizzesTestsChapter TestsDiscussionsAssignments

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and reports, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

ExamChapter TestsReport
“I missed an , and I was still able to pass the course with a C grade.”
CAHM20
“ , you will use the text some, but you probably could get by using the library's copy.”
CAHM2082670

Online

Online reviews clearly mention quizzes and tests, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

QuizzesTestsModule-Based Quizzes
“followed by a from the entire module.”
NUTR22
“ , and assignments.”
NUTR22
“The book and but the !”
NUTR20

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Truly astounded by the rigor she expected out of this intro class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ and I spend half my time deciphering what she wants for the assignments.”

⚖️

22/100

“She was extreme with the grading and too serious for the subject of the course.”

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“For a 2 credit course, I am doing more work than my 3 and 4 credit courses.”

👍 Recommendation Level

28/100

“ sanity.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's very nice and and .
  • Professor and expected them to be done with .
  • Very rude. Not supportive

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It wasn't difficult to get an A in the class.
  • She is a bit of a but not too bad, it's still easy to pass.
  • .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • There is an insane amount of busy work and she is a .
  • Lots of .
  • This class is entirely too time consuming for what it is.

Theme 4

❤️ About Support & Flexibility

  • Instructor lacks sympathy and will not give more time for due dates even during emergencies.
  • She offers pretty often as well so if you need to bump up your grade you can.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 27 reviews across many years, with , and support.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 514

Course coverage

NUTR2012 reviews
CAHM2011 reviews
NUTR223 reviews
CAHM20826701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 9

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1