AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Steve Steve

COS126 · GEO503 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if and a supportive professor, but the evidence is limited.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesFair examsCaringExtra creditSparse praise
  • All , but comments are very brief.
  • Students mention , and .
  • The evidence suggests a positive experience, but the small review count limits confidence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

High reported grades, , and universal recommendation suggest strong reward for effort, though one online review marked high difficulty.

and fair exams, while the only online review is positive but not detailed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The courses do not look effortless because difficulty ratings are moderate to high, but .

In-person comments suggest manageable courses, while the online review lacks detail despite a high difficulty rating.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

, and comments describe fair exams, care, and good treatment.

Both online and in-person evidence are positive, but online evidence is only one very short review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Grades are high and , while as fair.

Format shift

Leniency evidence comes mainly from in-person reviews, not the brief online review.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reviews give little workload detail, so the .

Format shift

Neither format provides enough workload evidence for a strong claim.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students , and positive treatment, but comments are sparse.

Format shift

In-person comments provide most teaching evidence, while online evidence is only one word.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

The clearest assessment evidence mentions exams, and the online tag set also marks the course as test heavy.

Format shift

, while online evidence only tags the course as test heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are positive, , and respect.

Main concern

The in-person comments are favorable but short, so details are thin.

What students said

“ .”
COS126
“He was very good to me and our class”
GEO503
“GOOD”
GEO503

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is extremely positive but too brief to prove much beyond satisfaction.

Main concern

The online evidence is only one word and .

What students said

“Perfect”
COS126

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention fair exams and test-heavy structure, but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book rules.

Fair ExamsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence directly says exams are fair but .

Fair Exams
“ .”
COS126

Online

The online review has a test-heavy tag but .

Test Heavy
“Perfect”
COS126

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“He was very good to me and our class”

⚖️

74/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He was very good to me and our class

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • .
  • Perfect

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He was very good to me and our class
  • GOOD

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

, and most comments are too short to support detailed conclusions.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COS1262 reviews
GEO5032 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values