AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Patrick Meyer

HSERVALL · PSYCH39C · HSVSCCT · HSERV60 · HSERV161 · HSERV53 · HS51 · HRSV · PSYCH39AB · ETHICS · PSYCH37C · PSYCH33 · HSERV50 · HSERV16062 · PSYCHOLOGY · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Take Meyer if you want a chance of doing well.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring mentorEngaging discussionsLight workloadFlexible gradingHighly recommended
  • Students repeatedly describe him as one of the .
  • His classes are usually easy and rewarding if students show up, participate, and .
  • The main criticism is occasional boredom, organization issues, or a course level that may feel too easy for some learners.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Students , and strong results if they participate and complete the work.

Online and full credit for assignments, while In person reviews tie success to attendance and participation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Most reviews call the classes easy to follow and practical, though a few say the material still matters or lacks college-level rigor.

Both formats suggest accessible courses, with In person reviews giving broader evidence across many years.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

Showing up and participating helps a lot, but one review says Zoom is offered when students cannot attend in person.

In person reviews stress attendance and participation, while Online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him for his care, flexibility, useful content, and engaging class environment.

Both Online and In person reviews are strongly positive, with In person evidence much more extensive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Reviews mention few graded items, full credit for completed assignments, flexible deadlines, and easy success with participation.

Format shift

Online reviews are especially strong on grading leniency, while In person .

Workload

Light

84/100

as light, occasional, or about three hours per week, with participation doing much of the work.

Format shift

Online and In person reviews both describe manageable workload, though In person reviews mention showing up and discussion more often.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students consistently describe him as caring, funny, knowledgeable, practical, and deeply supportive.

Format shift

Both formats praise his teaching, with In person reviews providing the strongest and longest-running evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention assignments, participation, discussions, readings, packets, and .

Format shift

In person reviews provide most assessment evidence, while and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person reviews overwhelmingly describe him as , and easy to succeed with through participation.

Main concern

Some students find lectures boring, unorganized, or not rigorous enough.

What students said

“One of the , so smart, very funny and very captivating with his lectures.”
HSERV50
“Classes are very easy as long as you show up to every class”
HRSV
“Utterly appalled at how easily his courses are taught.”
HSERV161

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews praise him as , and .

Main concern

Online evidence is positive but limited and .

What students said

“The and as long as you do the assignments, he will give you 100%.”
HSERV161
“Exceptional teacher and an exceptional person.”
ETHICS

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

review calling tests average and noting a study guide while online exam policies are not proven.

Average TestsStudy GuideUnclear Online Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In and require studying, with a study guide provided.

Average TestsStudy Guide
“ .”
PSYCHOLOGY
“You have to study but he gives a study guide.”
PSYCHOLOGY

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, Lockdown Browser, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DO NOT LEAVE CABRILLO WITHOUT TAKING THIS TEACHER! YOU WILL MISS OUT ON A GREAT OPPORTUNITY!”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, flexibility, workload, and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“One of the , so smart, very funny and very captivating with his lectures.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“ !”

📈 Easy A Potential

88/100

“The and as long as you do the assignments, he will give you 100%.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are interesting, fun, and filled with valuable information one can use to be a counselor in the drug and alcohol addiction field of work.
  • He uses a variety of communication methods to get across to students.
  • I love Patricks lectures!!!

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • He cares for his students and understands things happen in people's personal lives.
  • Patrick cares very much about each students success of his students in the human services field.
  • Such a great professor. He's very focused on active listening and .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload And Grades

  • Classes are very easy as long as you show up to every class
  • Home work is an average of 3 hours a week but not always assigned.
  • Take this teacher if you want to have fun, learn & get a good grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-eight reviews span many years, include repeated course experiences, and show unusually consistent praise despite a few mild criticisms.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HSERV505 reviews
HSERV1614 reviews
HS513 reviews
HRSV2 reviews
HSERV602 reviews
Show 10 more courses
PSYCH332 reviews
PSYCHOLOGY2 reviews
ETHICS1 review
HSERV160621 review
HSERV531 review
HSERVALL1 review
HSVSCCT1 review
PSYCH37C1 review
PSYCH39AB1 review
PSYCH39C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values