AI Rate Professor

English

Ariel Robello

ENGL1A · ENG2 · ENGL2 · ENG96091 · 96119ENG · ENGL2MCH · ENG1A · CLTE1 · ENGL232 · ENGLISH40 · ENGLMCH2 · ENG12F · ENGL1ENGL2 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
62.86%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take Robello if and can tolerate inconsistent organization.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but inconsistentEasy gradingDisorganized assignmentsStrong discussion topicsMixed feedback quality
  • Many students describe Robello as caring, inspiring, and flexible, especially in literature and multicultural courses.
  • Grades are often high, but the because , and organization vary a lot.
  • Online reviews are more negative about disorganization and communication, while and the sharpest recent complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Most grades are A-range and several students say completing work earns an A, but unclear expectations and .

Online evidence leans easier to pass but more self-managed, while and stricter expectations in some sections.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

The material is usually accessible English reading and writing, but , and sensitive discussion topics can raise the challenge.

Online reviews emphasize easy passing with disorganized modules, while and tougher writing expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Participation matters in many reviews, but comments do not show a .

Online reviews stress discussions and deadlines, while and one review says skipping class hurts success.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

63/100

Students recommend her when she is engaged and supportive, but repeated complaints about disorganization, communication, and .

In-person reviews include more passionate praise, while online reviews and limited help.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

62/100

Grades are often high and some students call her forgiving, but several others call her a .

Format shift

Online reviews are more divided on grading fairness, while and tough essay expectations.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload is mostly papers, readings, discussions, and homework or end-loaded work.

Format shift

Online students report readings, discussions, and deadline issues, while , and participation-heavy work.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

, and inspiring discussions, but many negative reviews cite disorganization, poor communication, vague assignments, and recent class cancellations.

Format shift

In-person teaching has stronger highs and recent reliability concerns, while online teaching has more consistent complaints about organization and feedback.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment , and participation rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions and essays heavily, while , and one explicit no-tests experience.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly split, with many students praising her care, feedback, and engaging material, while others cite , and .

Main concern

The main risk is inconsistent structure and reliability, especially in recent in-person reviews.

What students said

“Professor Robello is the most understanding and flexible professor I had ever had.”
ENG1A
“ , but cancelled 90% of classes.”
ENG2
“I enjoyed her class. There is a good amount of work to do, but she's not a .”
ENGL2

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe an easy-to-pass class with caring moments, but frequent complaints about disorganized , and uneven communication.

Main concern

Online students often need to manage unclear directions and .

What students said

“ . .”
ENG12F
“I also had a very tough time reading the directions for assignments, as .”
ENGL2MCH
“If you want a class that is easy to pass, very little work, and you do not care about becoming a .”
ENGL2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly describe papers and discussions, with one in-person review reporting no tests and , or final rules.

Essay BasedDiscussion BasedNo Tests Reported In PersonUnclear Online Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation, with one student explicitly saying they had no tests.

No Tests ReportedEssaysParticipation
“ .”
ENGL1A
“We had three big essays and .”
ENGL2MCH

Online

Online reviews mention essays, discussions, and papers, but they do not clearly prove webcam, .

EssaysDiscussionsUnclear exam policy
“The grade.”
ENG2
“If you , and your work (ON TIME) you will get an A.”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Professor so far as an undergrad student at USF.”

📈 Grade Effort

78/100

“Do your work and you'll get an A.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

38/100

“ and don't have the slightest bit of effort put into them.”

👍 Recommendation Level

63/100

“ if you get the chance! Esp writers!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and knows what she's talking about.
  • .
  • I didn't learn much to improve my writing but had an overall positive experience in this honors course

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's hard to get a low grade on an your opinion.
  • If you are a strong writer this class will be extremely easy and worthwhile for the multicultural emphasis.
  • She is a and liked it her way.

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization

  • The class itself and .
  • and learned nothing.
  • She would often lose track of class time, so pacing throughout the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The rating uses 35 reviews across many years and both formats, with detailed but highly , and organization.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 55
3 out of 56
2 out of 57
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGL1A7 reviews
ENGL26 reviews
ENGL2MCH5 reviews
ENG1A3 reviews
ENG23 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ENGLISH403 reviews
ENGLMCH22 reviews
96119ENG1 review
CLTE11 review
ENG12F1 review
ENG960911 review
ENGL1ENGL21 review
ENGL2321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 7 · A 16 · A- 1

B range

4

B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1