AI Rate Professor

Cabrillo College · Health Science

Julieanne Jones

HS10 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if and an easy path to an A more than consistency in professionalism.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing ExperienceHelpful Study GuidesGuest SpeakersClear GradingProfessionalism Concerns
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found her helpful and students who described serious professionalism problems.
  • Grades appear easy to earn, with most reported grades being A and .
  • The strongest concerns are tone, respect for adult students, and classroom professionalism in recent reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A appears very reachable because most reported grades are A and students mention and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course content appears manageable, with low average difficulty and and varied activities.

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person HS10 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters is tagged once, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

, and there is no online attendance evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split because some students praise her support while others report serious professionalism issues.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with sharply mixed sentiment.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Reported grades are mostly A, and and study guides.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

Reviews mention activities, discussions, and group projects but .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

passion and support balanced by recent complaints about professionalism.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to include exams, study guides, participation, activities, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but a highly polarizing teaching experience.

Main concern

Several recent students describe patronizing and unprofessional behavior.

What students said

“She might get side tracked, but she means well and wants you to succeed.”
HS10
“She treats full-grown adult professionals like elementary school kids”
HS10
“Her and she never surprises you with anything.”
HS10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support study guides and predictable exams, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, webcam, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Study GuidesNo Surprise ExamsExam Format Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams but do not clearly prove detailed exam rules.

Study GuidesNo Surprise Exams
“Her and she never surprises you with anything.”
HS10
“She also gives us a study guide, and use it to get an A .”
HS10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her and she never surprises you with anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and professionalism. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“She's a good teacher and is passionate about what she teaches.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“ !!”

⚖️

78/100

“She also gives us a study guide, and use it to get an A .”

⚠️ Professionalism Concern

35/100

“She treated adult professionals like kids, constantly overstepping boundaries & showing zero respect for basic professional conduct.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's a good teacher and is passionate about what she teaches.
  • She might get side tracked, but she means well and wants you to succeed.
  • Her and she never surprises you with anything.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She also gives us a study guide, and use it to get an A .
  • The never does the same thing, she makes the class fun by making students do different activities.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Professionalism

  • She is patronizing and deeply unprofessional.
  • Julieanne Jones treats her students like children.
  • She made what should've been a valuable program feel like a joke

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

, but sentiment is polarized and several negative reviews cluster on the same date.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HS106 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1