AI Rate Professor

Music

Stephanie Gelman

MUS96773 · MUS77 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
68.75%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take her if and writing, but be cautious with online sections because support and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Grading CriteriaExtra CreditWork HeavyPolarizing Online SupportMusic And Arts Focus
  • Most students find the class organized, clear, and capable of being an easy A with consistent reading and writing.
  • Online reviews are polarized, with strong praise for structure but , and workload.
  • and describe the course as , and not too difficult.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is very reachable with reading, quizzes, and writing, but several online students say the grading and workload can still be frustrating.

as straightforward, while online reviews are split between easy A praise and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The material is usually described as easy or not too difficult, but , and critical thinking keep it from being effortless.

In-person reviews are smoother and more positive, while online and uneven lecture quality.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Online asynchronous reviews suggest flexibility, but participation matters appears in tags and .

Online sections appear more flexible, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and , but harsh online complaints lower the overall confidence.

, while online recommendation is more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and , but multiple online students describe her as tough, harsh, or unreasonable.

Format shift

and more forgiving, while online grading receives the harshest complaints.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The course often includes reading, essays, quizzes, and weekly writing, so the workload is steady rather than light.

Format shift

Online reviews more often mention lots of homework and papers, while but manageable work.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Many students praise her organization, knowledge, and responsiveness, but online reviews include serious complaints about support and lecture quality.

Format shift

, while online teaching feedback ranges from excellent to poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to , and a .

Format shift

Online reviews mention essays, tests, and modules, while , and a final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly enthusiastic, describing Gelman as , and fair with .

Main concern

Students should expect critical thinking, reading, and .

What students said

“ . Thoughtful and engaging class!”
MUS77
“Expect critical thinking and a , but also enjoyable discoveries.”
MUS77
“Super straight forward class, no surprises, questions on the final and midterm are taken directly from the as many times as you want to get an A.”
MUS77

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with many students calling the class organized and easy with reading, while , and heavy work.

Main concern

Online students , and steady written work independently.

What students said

“Very easy A as long as you read all the material she provides in the modules.”
MUS77
“ class but it is required for my major.”
MUS77
“There are a few essays but nothing too big.”
MUS77

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and a , but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

QuizzesTestsMidterm And FinalExam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and midterm questions come directly from repeatable quizzes, making exams more predictable.

Midterm And FinalRepeatable QuizzesPredictable Exam Questions
“questions on the final and midterm are taken directly from the as many times as you want to get an A.”
MUS77

Online

Online reviews mention tests and quizzes but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

TestsQuizzesExam Policy Unclear
“there was stuff on the information we had to read.”
MUS77
“Harsh and unforgiving. Did not feel supported one bit.”
MUS77

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very easy A as long as you read all the material she provides in the modules.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“ , and caring!”

📈 Easy A Reality

78/100

“Very easy A as long as you read all the material she provides in the modules.”

⚖️

58/100

“ class but it is required for my major.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very enthusiastic and knowledgable about her subject.
  • Fantastic course , and caring.
  • Lectures were terrible, honestly felt like she put so little effort in.

Theme 2

📚 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Great class, easy, but taught much.
  • Not to hard but still somewhat work heavy..
  • Expect critical thinking and a , but also enjoyable discoveries.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • This class was online and asynchronous so all my interactions with the professor were when I'd read her announcements.
  • and very flexible a lot of work but it kept me busy I learned a lot in this class
  • Harsh and unforgiving. Did not feel supported one bit.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across many years and both formats provide detailed, consistent themes despite polarized online opinions.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MUS7714 reviews
MUS967732 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values