AI Rate Professor

Medicine

Raj Mehat

MA173A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

for strong teaching or deep learning.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery Easy ALow Learning ValueMinimal WorkWeak Online Teaching
  • Both reviews suggest the course is extremely easy and grades are easy to earn.
  • Teaching quality is weak overall because students report learning little, especially online.
  • The in-person review is more forgiving, while the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

96/100

Both students earned A-level grades and describe very little work, common-sense directions, or answers being given.

Both online and the online review making that .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

92/100

The course content sounds extremely basic, with students saying it is really easy and mostly common sense.

Both formats describe the course as easy, though the online review is more critical of the learning value.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

The reviews do not clearly .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

, but the poor learning experience makes the recommendation very conditional.

The in-person review is mildly acceptable, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

95/100

because both students received A-level grades with little reported work.

Format shift

Both online and .

Workload

Featherlight

95/100

Students describe very little work, common-sense directions, and answers being given.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

The course is easy, but students report learning little and the online review calls the teaching extremely lazy.

Format shift

, while online feedback is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention directions and answers but do not clearly describe exams, .

Format shift

Neither format gives clear evidence of exams or proctored assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The in-person review says the class is really easy and the professor responds, but learning value is limited.

Main concern

The course may feel too basic or not useful for real learning.

What students said

“The class was really easy, did I learn much, no”
MA-173A
“She responded when I reached out, lot of directions was common sense.”
MA-173A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The online review describes the class as extremely easy but poorly taught, with very little learning value.

Main concern

The main concern is lazy teaching and lack of learning.

What students said

“Extremely lazy teaching.”
MA-173A
“Answers are given to you with very little work.”
MA-173A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or .

Exam Policy Unclear

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Unclear

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you need this class for a credit and you're not interested in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in ease, teaching quality, and learning value. Credibility rating: Low.

📈 Easy A

96/100

“Answers are given to you with very little work.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Extremely lazy teaching.”

📚 Learning Value

35/100

“I needed an engaging course and I have not learned anything.”

Theme 1

📈 About Ease And Grades

  • The class was really easy, did I learn much, no
  • Answers are given to you with very little work.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Quality

  • Extremely lazy teaching.
  • She responded when I reached out, lot of directions was common sense.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, so the pattern is useful but not highly reliable.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MA-173A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values