AI Rate Professor

Cabrillo College · English

Rachel Fields

ENGL1A · ENG2 · ENGL2 · ENG1A · ENGLISH1A · ENGL100 · ENGLISH2 · ENGL7681 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want an engaging and fairly graded English class and , and some uneven structure.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging discussionsFunny lecturesFair gradingWriting focusedMixed structure
  • Most students describe Fields as funny, kind, and engaging, especially in .
  • Grades are usually fair and attainable, but students still need to keep up with , and participation.
  • A small but important group of reviews criticizes slow feedback, vague structure, or not learning enough.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very attainable because grading is usually fair or easy, but students , and discussion work.

Online evidence is limited and mixed, while grading.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The course content is generally accessible, but the writing, reading, and .

Online reviews mention easy writing but multiple books, while and essays.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as mandatory, but and no late-work tolerance make showing up important.

Online reviews mention effort and late-work expectations, while experience.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her because , and fair, despite some complaints about structure and feedback.

, while online reviews are too mixed and sparse to carry the same confidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students often describe grading as fair or fairly easy, with no strong pattern of .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions clear criteria and but also late-work strictness, while or easy.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload is manageable but , and occasional group or writing assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews mention multiple books and writing assignments, while , and lots of writing.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most reviews praise her energy, humor, kindness, and discussions, but several students say the class lacked structure or depth.

Format shift

, while online feedback is mixed because of delayed grading and limited learning.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment appears , and quizzes rather than major exams.

Format shift

Both formats point toward assignment-based grading, with and take-home quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing fun , and a relaxed but writing-heavy class.

Main concern

Students who want tight lecture structure may .

What students said

“It was fairly easy, but there were a lot of discussions.”
ENGL1A
“There are a total of 4 essays and you read one book and many in class discussions.”
ENGLISH1A
“Felt a bit cheated would have enjoyed more lectures, structure, and thoroughness.”
ENGL2

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with one student praising easy writing work and and limited learning.

Main concern

Feedback and access may be inconsistent online.

What students said

“Took 6 weeks to grade our first essay, gave it back 2 days before the second one was due.”
ENGL2
“ but they were easy”
ENGL2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and no traditional tests in some in-person sections, making exam risk low.

Take-Home QuizzesNo Test MentionedAssignment-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

quizzes and at least one report of no tests.

Take-Home QuizzesNo Test Mentioned
“ and she grades fairly easy.”
ENG1A
“ , and immature students who didn't take the class serious.”
ENG2

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ better writer for it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and structure. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She had great energy and made coming to class fun. I learned a lot from her as well.”

👍 Recommendation Level

86/100

“ !”

⚖️

76/100

“She also grades fairly when you don't hold to convention.”

📚 Workload Reality

62/100

“There is a lot of writing involved, but one.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is such a great professor, her lectures are so interesting and you are always engaged in what she has to say.
  • She tops all of my past English teachers!
  • She is so cool, and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She makes class fun and easy if you show effort.
  • and she grades fairly easy.
  • She's super easy, and very nice, but seems like she gave up on teaching about a third of the way through.

Theme 3

🧭 About Structure and Feedback

  • Took 6 weeks to grade our first essay, gave it back 2 days before the second one was due.
  • Too vague and .
  • Felt a bit cheated would have enjoyed more lectures, structure, and thoroughness.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 19 reviews span many years and repeat similar themes, though some older and online evidence is limited.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1A6 reviews
ENGL1A3 reviews
ENGL23 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
849681 review
Show 4 more courses
ENG21 review
ENGL1001 review
ENGL76811 review
ENGLISH21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1