AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Liz Roberts

SOCIO2 · SOCSOC · SOC2O · SOC1 · FDFD2333 · SOC2 · SOCSP · SOC7099 · 52 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
34.78%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take Roberts only if and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh essay gradingHeavy writing loadDisorganized modulesMixed responsivenessClear rubrics for prepared students
  • and heavy writing as the main risk.
  • Online reviews are especially polarized, with but many complaints about workload and communication.
  • The course can reward disciplined students, but many reviewers say the teaching support does not match the workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible, but comments repeatedly , and careful compliance with strict rubrics.

Online reviews include both easy-A claims and severe grading complaints, while students but many warnings about harsh grading.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The sociology content is not always advanced, but students , and demanding essays make the course feel challenging.

Online difficulty centers on modules, writing, and reading, while , and essay grading.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but participation and keeping up with class activity appear important for success.

Online reviews emphasize keeping up with modules and discussions, while in-person reviews mention participation but do .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Recommendation is low because , and frustrating communication despite some strong positive reviews.

Both formats have positive outliers, but online reviews are more sharply negative about workload and communication while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or and written assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews stress strict rubrics and paper grading, while and unclear grading expectations.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is often described as lots of reading, papers, quizzes, and frequent assignments, though a few students found it manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews most often mention heavy writing and modules, while to work due every day.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with some students praising clarity and passion but .

Format shift

Online reviews focus on responsiveness and organization, while , and unclear directions.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and quizzes more than major exams.

Format shift

Online evidence strongly emphasizes papers, discussions, quizzes, and fieldwork projects, while , and some tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person evidence is also mixed, with some strong praise but frequent , and .

Main concern

directions, and a lecture style that some find unhelpful.

What students said

“This teacher doesn't teach anything.”
SOC1
“ . Doesn't even clarify what she wants in them.”
SOC2
“Everything was laid out perfectly and and was not time consuming.”
SOC1

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly divided but often cite heavy writing, strict rubrics, and weak communication.

Main concern

Online students most , and unclear or disorganized modules.

What students said

“ and its so disorganized.”
SOC2
“I put in full effort every time and followed the , and I have never gotten 100% on a single assignment.”
SOC1
“It was very work-heavy, but once I got into the swing of things, it was easy to complete all of the .”
SOC1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and mixed, with comments proving quizzes, some timed tests, and demanding essays but not a .

Timed TestsQuizzesEssay-Based AssessmentUnclear Exam Details

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and , but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules, open-book rules, or proctoring rules.

QuizzesExamsEssay Grading
“The and ask for unexpected questions like the authors name or small details that are hard to remember from the reading”
SOC1
“Gives you a page of notes from the exams.”
SOC2
“ as are exams.”
SOC1

Online

, and papers, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam rules, or proctoring rules.

Timed TestsQuizzesFieldwork Papers
“In fact most of and make little to no sense.”
SOC2
“She has a few quizzes, but the discussions and .”
SOC1
“ .”
SOC2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher doesn't teach anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“She is basically not a teacher at all.”

⚖️

20/100

“She is the . Beyond merciless.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“Dropped the class halfway through the semester because it was far too intense.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

34/100

“Save your time and money and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This teacher doesn't teach anything.
  • She doesn't teach she just talks.
  • Liz Roberts is an excellent teacher! She's energetic and passionate about what she teaches!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is an ; I cannot stress .
  • . Doesn't even clarify what she wants in them.
  • I got over 100% in her class and It was my first semester in college.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Work due every single day.
  • Expected about a 6 page essay every couple weeks.
  • The workload is very light yet insightful and Prof Roberts is very fair in .

Theme 4

💬 About Communication

  • Really good communicator outside of class and made this class very enjoyable
  • don't expect responses to emails, prompt grading, or a mind blowing experience.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

52

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years, include detailed comments, and show consistent recurring themes despite mixed opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 57
3 out of 58
2 out of 510
1 out of 516

Course coverage

SOC127 reviews
SOC215 reviews
SOCIO22 reviews
SOCSOC2 reviews
FDFD23331 review
Show 3 more courses
SOC2O1 review
SOC70991 review
SOCSP1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 4 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

4

B 2 · B- 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Audit/No_Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3