AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Murat Bulut

MATH5B · MATH4 · MATH5A · CABGEA2 · MATH1216 · 5B · CALC5A · MATH152 · MATH12 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
58.97%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take him if you will attend consistently and keep up with homework, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear but Polarizing LecturerHomework HeavyTest HeavyAttendance HelpsStrict Exam Grading
  • Students are split between calling him an excellent math explainer and calling the class disorganized or harsh.
  • Grades can be strong, but , and .
  • The main risks are heavy ALEKS or , and limited flexibility around exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students earn A grades, but comments tie that to doing lots of , and preparing carefully for heavily weighted exams.

, while in-person evidence shows better results when students attend and follow his exam guidance.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The math content is manageable with , but fast pacing, cumulative material, and challenging ALEKS work keep it from feeling easy.

Online reviews describe more self-teaching, while clearly.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

as formally mandatory, but students repeatedly say missing class makes exams and learning much harder.

In-person reviews strongly stress attendance, while but still describe heavy independent work.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

59/100

and structure, but many warn against his workload, exams, and communication issues.

In-person sentiment is mixed but often positive, while online sentiment is mostly negative except one strong 5B review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Exams often dominate the grade, several students report no partial credit or , and .

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both describe exam-heavy grading, with in-person reviews giving more examples of harsh no-partial-credit systems.

Workload

Heavy

27/100

Homework is repeatedly described as and multiple exams.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize 3-4 online homework sets and packets, while and .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

He has many strong comments for and care, but a large minority call him disorganized, unresponsive, or ineffective.

Format shift

In-person reviews show both excellent and poor teaching experiences, while online reviews lean more negative about teaching and communication.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and exams making up most of the grade.

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy, though online reviews especially stress exams with little preparation support.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, with many praising clear explanations and care while , and disorganization.

Main concern

, and performing on exams.

What students said

“He would break information down really well and ”
MATH5B
“ ”
MATH5A
“ if you go to class.”
MATH12

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, , and communication problems.

Main concern

Online students often while .

What students said

“I basically taught myself using the online textbook.”
MATH152
“No study guides for exams.”
MATH12
“Grade is 50% exams, 25% final.”
5B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly show a and sometimes pop quizzes, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyHigh Exam WeightPop QuizzesLimited Study GuidesOnline Homework Platform

Assessment risk

Standard

43/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, review sessions, and class-note-based exams, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book policy.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesReview SessionsClass-Note-Based Exams
“the exams are worth 75% of your grade.”
MATH5A
“surprise quizzes”
MATH12
“ and class notes”
Math4

Online

Online reviews mention difficult exams, , and , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book policy.

Test HeavyNo Study GuidesHigh Exam WeightConfusing Exam Submission
“ .”
MATH152
“The format to turn in .”
MATH12
“ , but are fair”
5B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Keep up with the hw and study what he tells you to for exams and you'll do great.”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“He would break information down really well and ”

📚 Workload Pressure

27/100

“The and takes forever.”

⚖️

34/100

“No partial credit for work or !!”

👍 Recommendation Level

59/100

“If you do the and follow his study guides its an easy A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • ways for all students to understand.
  • The structure of the class in .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is .
  • if you go to class.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • No study guides for exams.
  • .
  • Exam 3 class avg. was around 54%

Theme 4

❤️ About Support

  • .
  • He always answered questions after class and during office hours.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

89/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 39 reviews across several years, many courses, and both formats, with consistent , and grading.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 53
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH1220 reviews
MATH5B5 reviews
MATH5A4 reviews
Math43 reviews
CALC5A2 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH1522 reviews
5B1 review
CABGEA21 review
MATH12161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 2 · A 15 · A- 1

B range

10

B+ 5 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 3