Is this an easy A?
EasyA
84/100Getting an A usually requires steady completion of weekly work, quizzes, essays, and .
Online reviews emphasize keeping up with weekly modules, while and completing homework.
USHISTORY · HISTORY17A · 17A · HIST17B · AB17 · HIST17A · 17B · 26 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Getting an A usually requires steady completion of weekly work, quizzes, essays, and attendance rather than intense studying.
Online reviews emphasize keeping up with weekly modules, while in-person reviews more often stress attending lecture and completing homework.
Is the course easy?
The history content is made approachable through lectures, videos, PowerPoints, and clear review materials, though there is a steady amount of work.
Online students describe the work as time-consuming but manageable, while in-person students mostly describe the material as easy to understand.
Is attendance flexible?
Attendance is often important because reviews mention weekly class meetings, lecture journals, participation, and not skipping class.
Both formats include hybrid-style attendance expectations, with online reviews especially mentioning required weekly meetings or lecture participation.
Is this professor recommended?
Most students recommend her because she is engaging, caring, and gives clear paths to succeed, despite workload and a few harsh negative experiences.
Both formats are mostly positive, but online reviews include the strongest complaints about strict handling and grading.
Course guide
Grading
Lenient
74/100
Most reported grades are A-range and students repeatedly say the class is easy if work is completed, though a few call her a tough grader.
Format shift
Online reviews are more mixed on grading strictness, while in-person reviews more often call exams and grading fair.
Workload
Moderate
48/100
The workload is steady with weekly modules, documentaries, quizzes, papers, and readings, but students usually call it manageable.
Format shift
Online reviews mention heavier weekly online work more often, while in-person reviews frame the workload as reasonable.
Teaching experience
Excellent
87/100
Students frequently describe her as enthusiastic, caring, organized, and good at making history interesting, with a few serious complaints about clarity or strictness.
Format shift
In-person reviews are especially strong on lecture quality, while online reviews praise organization but include more workload and grading concerns.
Assessment method
Balanced
56/100
Assessment appears balanced across quizzes, online modules, papers, midterms, and finals rather than relying only on exams.
Format shift
Online reviews mention modules, documentary quizzes, essays, midterm, and final, while in-person reviews mention papers, quizzes, midterm, and final.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly
In-person reviews are strongly positive about lectures, enthusiasm, fairness, and clear paths to passing.
Main concern
Some students find lectures long, and one review reports unclear structure and rambling.
What students said
“She made it very easy to understand the material and makes good connections to modern times.”
“This class is not stressful and is fairly easy.”
“her assignments are extremely unclear”
Remote format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
Online and hybrid reviews describe an organized class with steady weekly work, documentary quizzes, essays, and generally manageable grading.
Main concern
Students need to keep up with frequent online assignments and occasional required live participation.
What students said
“Lots due each week but it's mostly just time-consuming, not difficult, so it's very manageable.”
“As long as you keep up with the online work it's a very easy A.”
“Dropped me because I didn't turn in 1 assignment”
Exam style
Reviews describe fair exams, quizzes, papers, and some note support, but they do not clearly prove open-book exams, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.
Assessment risk
Standard
76/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews mention fair midterms and finals, half-sheet notes, and multiple quiz attempts, but do not clearly prove closed-book exams or strict proctoring.
“Allowed half sheet of notes on both exams.”
“quizzes and docuentary test in blackboard allow two attempts which is great.”
“The midterm and final were very fair.”
Online reviews mention documentary quizzes, midterms, a final essay, and review materials, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.
“Midterm prepares you for final, which is a roughly 1500 word essay.”
“Take lots of notes for midterm and review.”
“online quizzes, documentaries, Midterm, 1 essay and Final.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“As long as you keep up with the online work it's a very easy A.”
“Davie is a fantastic teacher!”
“Highly recommend.”
“As long as you keep up with the online work it's a very easy A.”
“The midterm and final were very fair.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Theme 4
Data context
Analysis sample
26
Recent reviews read by the AI
26
Lifetime ratings
91/100
Evidence confidence
Credibility is high because 26 reviews span many years, both formats are equally represented, and comments give consistent detail about teaching, workload, grading, and exams.
Inside 26 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
17 reported outcomes
A+ 4 · A 9
B+ 2 · B 1
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
Drop/Withdrawal 1