Is this an easy A?
EasyA
82/100An A is very reachable if students complete the , and essays, but it is not always effortless.
Online reviews emphasize steady weekly effort, while in-person , and some stricter grading exceptions.
ENGL1A · ENG2 · ENGL2 · ENG100 · ENG1ONLINE · ENGL286658 · ENGL100 · ENG1 · ENGLISH2 · 39 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
An A is very reachable if students complete the readings, discussions, and essays, but it is not always effortless.
Online reviews emphasize steady weekly effort, while in-person reviews more often mention clear rubrics, extra credit, and some stricter grading exceptions.
Is the course easy?
The course content is generally approachable, but regular reading, research essays, and discussions keep it from being effortless.
Online sections are described as organized and doable, while in-person sections range from very easy to boring or less helpful.
Is attendance flexible?
Online participation matters through discussions, and at least one in-person review says absences could lead to being dropped.
Online evidence points to required discussion participation, while in-person evidence includes one strict attendance warning.
Is this professor recommended?
Students usually recommend her because she is clear, caring, organized, and gives useful feedback.
Online reviews are more consistently enthusiastic, while in-person reviews include a few strong older warnings.
Course guide
Grading
Lenient
78/100
Grading is usually fair to easy when students follow rubrics and complete the work, though a few reviews say she is not simply an easy grader.
Format shift
Online reviews often call her an easy or clear grader, while in-person reviews mix easy grading with fair but not automatic grading.
Workload
Moderate
68/100
Workload is manageable but includes steady reading, discussions, quizzes, and multiple major essays.
Format shift
Online reviews describe predictable weekly pacing, while in-person reviews mention fewer papers but also constant reading in some sections.
Teaching experience
Excellent
86/100
Most students praise her organization, kindness, expectations, and feedback, despite several older in-person complaints about lecture quality.
Format shift
Online teaching feedback is consistently strong, while in-person teaching feedback is positive overall but less uniform.
Assessment method
FocusOnAssignments
35/100
Assessment appears centered on essays, discussions, readings, and quizzes rather than major exams.
Format shift
Both formats emphasize essays and recurring assignments, with online reviews giving more detail about discussions and module quizzes.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly
In-person reviews are mostly positive for clear expectations and fair grading, but older ENG100 comments report boring or unhelpful lectures and strict attendance.
Main concern
A small cluster of older in-person reviews says lectures were not useful and attendance could be strict.
What students said
“She shows previous students good works before every paper so you know what it will roughly look like and gives extremely clear grading criteria.”
“if you don't show up 3 times she will drop you from her class no hesitation.”
“Super helpful, not an easy A but if you do the work and ask for help as needed you'll get a good grade.”
Remote format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
Online reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing organized Canvas modules, quick responses, helpful feedback, and manageable weekly work.
Main concern
Students still need to keep pace with readings, discussions, quizzes, and major essays.
What students said
“The workload was super reasonable, the Canvas page was extremely organized, and she grades in a timely manner with great feedback.”
“This course has weekly readings & discussions (your response + replies to classmates) and 3 term papers.”
“Put in good effort and you will get an A.”
Exam style
Reviews mainly describe quizzes and essays, with one in-person review explicitly mentioning open-book quizzes and no clear proof of proctoring rules.
Assessment risk
Standard
72/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews mention few papers, quizzes, and one explicit open-book quiz policy, but they do not clearly prove final or proctoring rules.
“There are few papers, and most of the assignments are open-book quizzes, so as long as you try, you are guaranteed an A in the class.”
“three quizzes and three major essays.”
Online reviews mention quizzes, discussions, and essays, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring policy.
“Most homework was reading (articles and books [not textbooks]), online student discussions, easy quizzes on assigned readings, and three big essays.”
“3 2000 word papers, 3 10 question quizzes, 3 books and weekly discussions.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“If you can, absolutely take her class.”
“She was very organized and very clear about her expectations of us.”
“I definitely recommend this class!”
“She is a clear and easy grader as long as you do the work.”
“Lots of reading required, but this was an online class so it all comes down to pacing yourself with other classes.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Theme 4
Data context
Analysis sample
39
Recent reviews read by the AI
39
Lifetime ratings
91/100
Evidence confidence
The dataset has 39 reviews across many years and both formats, with repeated detailed patterns in grading, workload, and teaching style.
Inside 39 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
27 reported outcomes
A+ 3 · A 19 · A- 1
B 4
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values