AI Rate Professor

Art History

Heather Crowley

HIST4B · AH20A · AH10 · HIST4A · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
26.32%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take Heather Crowley only if , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderUnclear gradingSlow feedbackHeavy readingCaring when reachable
  • Most negative , and .
  • Online students report weak communication, inconsistent content, and .
  • A smaller , and better in some in-person settings.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earned A grades, but and extensive assignments make the A costly.

Online evidence is harsher and more unpredictable, while review.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course content is not described as conceptually extreme, but , and unclear expectations make it harder.

Online reviews emphasize inconsistent content and confusion, while and reading.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Participation is mentioned as sometimes required or important, but .

Online reviews mention rare required participation, while one review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and poorly supported.

, while in-person reviews include both strong warnings and a few recommendations.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call her a and , and late grades.

Format shift

Online and reviews adding more complaints about unclear standards.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews mention lots of reading, extensive writing, big assignments, and lecture-heavy work.

Format shift

Online students report extensive assignments and reading, while and homework.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

A few students praise her passion and care, but many , and .

Format shift

Online teaching is described as disconnected and inconsistent, while but still mixed evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

The reviews mostly discuss essays, discussions, readings, assignments, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online evidence centers on writing and discussion assignments, while , and open-book quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with some strong praise for passion and kindness but and slow turnaround.

Main concern

and delayed even when students put in strong effort.

What students said

“ and the quizzes, where you were allowed open book.”
HIST4A
“way too harsh of a .”
AH10
“Heather is a good professor.”
AH10

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints , and weak communication.

Main concern

Students often felt unsupported and unsure of their real grade until late in the term.

What students said

“Still managed to get an A, but it was one of my toughest classes ever.”
AH20A
“It didnt even feel like a class bc content was so inconsistent.”
HIST4B
“ if she is teaching online.”
HIST4A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, though .

Open-Book QuizzesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but reviews do not clearly prove broader exam rules.

Open-Book Quizzes
“the ”
HIST4A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Had her last year and was lost the whole time. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“It didnt even feel like a class bc content was so inconsistent.”

⚖️

18/100

“ seen, grades for things that weren't even asked for in the assignment originally.”

👍 Recommendation Level

28/100

“ if she is teaching online.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was very passionate about her work, and you could tell in the way she presented herself alongside her material for the class.
  • Professor Crowley was disconnected throughout the rush.
  • Barely felt like a (history) class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • and .
  • way too harsh of a .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support & Character

  • and .
  • Heather is very accommodating, I had some hardships this semester and when I reached out to her she was very caring and allowed me .
  • Although, she did .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 19 reviews span several years and repeatedly describe the , and communication issues.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 510

Course coverage

AH1010 reviews
HIST4A4 reviews
HIST4B3 reviews
AH20A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

1

C- 1

D range

2

D 1 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1