AI Rate Professor

English

Daphne Young

ENG102806 · ENGLISH100 · 1AMC · ENG100 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want feedback and structure, but if heavy writing workload and strict deadlines are a problem.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy Weekly WorkloadHarsh Online GradingNo Late WorkHelpful In PersonClear Expectations
  • Online reviews describe overwhelming weekly , and .
  • In person reviews are much more , and clear expectations.
  • The main risk is workload and no late work, especially in the online format.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Getting an A is possible, but students usually , and real effort rather than an easy grade.

and , while in person evidence says good grades are reachable through consistent work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The English content is introductory, but frequent reading, papers, and .

Online reviews make the course sound much harder, while in person reviews describe clearer expectations and more support.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

In person comments say skipping class will make students fall behind, and online comments stress strict deadlines with no late work.

In person evidence directly stresses attendance, while online evidence shows low deadline .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

and feedback, but online students often warn others to choose someone else.

In , while online reviews are strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Online students repeatedly call her a tough or harsh grader, though in .

Format shift

, while in as fair but not effortless.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

Students repeatedly mention five or more weekly assignments, many papers, and .

Format shift

Online reviews show the heaviest workload, while in and steady work.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is split because online students report confusion and weak support, while in , and care.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is poor, while in .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews , and weekly assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and writing work, with online reviews especially focused on weekly tasks.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person students mostly describe her as , and if you attend and do the work.

Main concern

Students still need to attend and keep up because the class is not a free grade.

What students said

“DAPHNE IS A GREAT TEACHER WHO GRADES FAIRLY.”
ENG102806
“All I did was the homework and classwork and got an easy A”
ENG100
“She didn't just give an easy grade; you had to work for a good grade”
ENGLISH100

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students consistently describe heavy weekly assignments, confusing instructions, no late work, and limited support.

Main concern

The online course can feel overwhelming because of frequent assignments and strict late-work rules.

What students said

“She has around 5 assignments due weekly.”
1AMC
“ .”
1AMC
“My advice pick someone else”
1AMC

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an , so .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews do not clearly prove .

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you take her, know that she assigns 5+ assignments a week and for someone working fulltime it's hard to keep up with all the readings and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“I have never had so many assignments for one class.”

⚖️

32/100

“Feedback sometimes did not make sense seemed like she would always look for a .”

👨‍🏫 In Person Teaching

55/100

“Great teacher. Very helpful and and on the assignments.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • She has around 5 assignments due weekly.
  • .
  • I have never had so many assignments for one class.

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades

  • Harsh grades.
  • She didn't just give an easy grade; you had to work for a good grade
  • DAPHNE IS A GREAT TEACHER WHO GRADES FAIRLY.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She will help all her students equally and show she cares.
  • and has everything poste on canvas for help
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across online and in person formats give useful patterns, but format opinions conflict and some reviews are older.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

1AMC4 reviews
ENG1001 review
ENG1028061 review
ENGLISH1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1