AI Rate Professor

Digital Media Production

Denise Gallant

DM34 · DM134A · DM32 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take her if you want a and and some disorganization.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring SupportBeginner FriendlyProject BasedDisorganized GradingHelpful Critiques
  • Students , and knowledgeable in video production.
  • The class is generally easy to pass when students complete weekly work and major projects.
  • The main weakness is organization, especially delayed or hidden grades and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The class is usually easy to pass if and , though grades may be delayed.

Online and in person reviews both suggest manageable grading, with in person comments most clearly saying the class is easy to pass.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

75/100

Students describe the course as beginner-friendly, module-based, and practical, with .

Online reviews emphasize concise videos and weekly tools, while in person reviews emphasize hands-on critique and support.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews , but in-class assignments and discussions suggest participation matters.

Online flexibility is clearer through modules, while in person .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, and helpful critiques despite organization problems.

Both formats are mostly positive, but online students complain more about grade visibility and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Grades appear attainable through completed assignments and projects, but .

Format shift

and timing, while in person reviews suggest passing is easy with completed work.

Workload

Light

72/100

The workload centers on weekly exercises and a few larger projects, which students mostly describe as manageable.

Format shift

Online modules are described as doable, while in person and three big projects.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

She is caring, knowledgeable, and helpful, but organization and tech confidence reduce the overall teaching experience.

Format shift

Online teaching is mixed because of tech and grade issues, while in person teaching is praised for support and critiques but criticized for organization.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

12/100

Assessment is clearly project and assignment based, including weekly exercises, class discussions, and major video projects.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and projects rather than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person reviews describe her as , and helpful, but .

Main concern

Organization and are useful.

What students said

“Her critiques vastly improved my videos.”
DM32
“Denise is sweet but .”
DM34
“Very knowledgeable and helpful, but .”
DM134A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews praise short instructional videos and beginner-friendly modules but complain about delayed or hidden grades.

Main concern

Students may not see grades or .

What students said

“Loved her instructional videos!”
DM34
“I couldn't see my grade until more than halfway through the semester.”
DM34
“Short videos with each module explaining each task, very concise.”
DM34

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews do not clearly prove .

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her critiques vastly improved my videos.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in support, projects, and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

👨‍🏫 Teaching Support

68/100

“ . She is there for support and wants to help/inspire her students.”

🎬 Project Learning

75/100

“Her class is good for beginners and people with more experience.”

🗂️ Organization Risk

40/100

“Denise is sweet but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Loved her instructional videos!
  • Very knowledgeable and helpful, but .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • As long as you keep in touch with her and complete the .
  • I couldn't see my grade until more than halfway through the semester.
  • Her lecture were fine but she takes a long time to grade things

Theme 3

🎬

  • Her critiques vastly improved my videos.
  • taught a couple new tools each week which made you learn the program very well.
  • Your grade consists of weekly in-class assignments and 3 big projects.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across many years show consistent strengths and weaknesses, but several older reviews lack grade and recommendation data.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

DM345 reviews
DM134A2 reviews
DM321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1