AI Rate Professor

Cabrillo College · Nutrition

Theresa Smith

NUTR20 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you can handle textbook-heavy work and prefer independent learning, especially online.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy Online WorkloadTextbook DependentLimited Online TeachingCaring In Person
  • Online students describe much more work than expected for NUTR20.
  • The and describes a caring teacher.
  • Getting a high grade is possible, but the online path can feel inefficient and frustrating.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A grades are possible, but online students describe hours of weekly textbook and side assignments, so the A is not low-effort.

, while the single in-person review reports an A with a smoother class experience.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The nutrition content itself does not sound highly advanced, but the course structure makes it feel harder than expected.

Online reviews emphasize workload difficulty, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though online Zoom and in-person participation are mentioned.

Online reviews mention Zoom structure, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recent online reviews are strongly .

Online students would likely hesitate, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

and describe demanding homework, though A grades are still possible.

Format shift

Online evidence suggests stricter grading pressure, while the .

Workload

Overwhelming

20/100

Online students report weekly textbook assignments taking multiple hours plus podcasts, Zoom, and side assignments.

Format shift

Online workload is the main problem, while the .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Online students say little time is spent teaching, but the as caring and engaged.

Format shift

Teaching is rated poorly online and positively in person, with stronger recent evidence coming from online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments focus on textbook , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews heavily emphasize homework, while the for homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Budget First

The as caring, enjoyable, and easier to follow with .

Main concern

The required McGraw textbook is expensive and needed for homework.

What students said

“Wonderful teacher, and can clearly see that she does care and enjoy the material.”
NUTR20
“The textbook (mcgraw) is expensive ($200), and is needed for the homework.”
NUTR20

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe heavy textbook work, weak live teaching value, and poor accommodation around required materials.

Main concern

The online workload feels excessive and not well connected to learning nutrition.

What students said

“more work than most stem class/4+ credit class ive took.”
NUTR20
“Professor did not spend any of this time teaching the material”
NUTR20

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final structure.

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book policy, or final structure.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book policy, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“more work than most stem class/4+ credit class ive took.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Professor did not spend any of this time teaching the material”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“3+hr textbook assignments weekly.”

⚖️ Format Split

58/100

“Wonderful teacher, and can clearly see that she does care and enjoy the material.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • more work than most stem class/4+ credit class ive took.
  • " that took over 2 hours to complete, weekly.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • only 1/3 of zoom is actual lecture/important.
  • Wonderful teacher, and can clearly see that she does care and enjoy the material.

Theme 3

💸 About Materials

  • ppl had issues w txtbook, basically told them they shouldve bought b4 class started + did not accommodate.
  • The textbook (mcgraw) is expensive ($200), and is needed for the homework.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but the online comments are detailed and consistent about workload.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NUTR203 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1