AI Rate Professor

Cabrillo College · Engineering

Robert Wyland

ENGR35 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid this professor unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganized LecturesTough GraderFrequent MistakesRigid MethodsCaring Outside Class
  • Most reviews describe lectures as , and full of mistakes.
  • as harsh and rigid, especially when students do not follow his exact method.
  • One review says he cares and helps outside class, but the overall recommendation signal is very negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible, but , and strict method-based grading.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course feels harder mainly because , and errors confuse the material.

Only in-person evidence exists, so .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews mention participation matters once but do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews discuss the class, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students mostly do not recommend him because of , and .

All recommendation evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online evidence to compare.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Multiple reviews call him a and say grades depend on following his exact method.

Format shift

The .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews mention labs and tests but do not clearly show an .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload-related items, with no online comparison.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most students describe unorganized lectures, critical mistakes, poor explanations, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and labs, with exams carrying the clearest risk.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

organization, mistakes in lecture, and tough grading.

Main concern

Students may need to self-teach while following .

What students said

“Doesn't teach the material well. and lectures directly from his notes.”
ENGR35
“He teaches directly from his notes but constantly makes critical errors.”
ENGR35
“ and full of mistakes.”
ENGR35

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , but tests are described as time-pressured and harshly graded.

Test HeavyTight Test TimingStrict Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a test with insufficient time, but do not clearly prove book, proctoring, or final format policies.

Test HeavyTight Test TimingStrict Grading
“He's also a !”
ENGR35
“He admitted to not giving enough time for a test but still gave everyone terrible grades on it.”
ENGR35
“Test heavy”
ENGR35

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and full of mistakes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ and full of mistakes.”

⚖️

12/100

“He grades based on how strictly you follow his specific method rather than how .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't teach the material well. and lectures directly from his notes.
  • He teaches directly from his notes but constantly makes critical errors.
  • Doesn't have solutions to examples in class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He's also a !
  • He admitted to not giving enough time for a test but still gave everyone terrible grades on it.
  • He grades based on how strictly you follow his specific method rather than how .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • he is always willing to assist outside of class and genuinely cares about his students.
  • The .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across several years are highly consistent about teaching problems and , though .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENGR356 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values